Author(s):
Upendra Kumar Sahu, Pankaj Kumar, Dr. Raksha Singh
Email(s):
upendrakumarsahu987@gmail.com , pankajsahu125@gmail.com , rakshasingh20@rediffmail.com
Address:
School of Studies in Economics, Pt. Ravishankar Shukla University, Raipur, Chhattisgarh
School of Studies in Economics, Pt. Ravishankar Shukla University, Raipur, Chhattisgarh
Shri Sankracharaya College, Bhilai-Durg, Chhattisgarh
Published In:
Volume - 27,
Issue - 1,
Year - 2021
DOI:
10.52228/JRUA.2021-27-1-10 
ABSTRACT:
This paper is a review of the recent advances in the Issues of Inequality and Environment Sustainability in Chhattisgarh during the current circumstances. Inequality and Environment Sustainability can have several dimensions. Economists are mostly concerned with the income and consumption dimensions of Inequalities. An Inequality includes in skill, health, wealth, education, opportunities, happiness and others. The direct and indirect effects of inequality in Environment Sustainability matters on earning and health, wealth, education, are discussed. This indicates that one should account for the interrelationship between the different dimensions in the measurement and analysis of inequalities. The paper discussed only about income, health and education indicators.
Cite this article:
Sahu, Sahu, and Singh (2021). Issues of Inequality and Environment Sustainability in Chhattisgarh. Journal of Ravishankar University (Part-A: SOCIAL-SCIENCE), 27(1), pp. 73-83.DOI: https://doi.org/10.52228/JRUA.2021-27-1-10
References:
1. Anderton, Douglas L., Andy B. Anderson, John Michael
Oakes, Michael R. Fraser, Eleanor W. Weber, and Edward J. Calabrese (1994a)
“Hazardous Waste Facilities: EnvironmentalEquity Issues in Metropolitan Areas,”
Evaluation Review 18(2): 123-140.
2. Almas
heshmati “Inequality and their measurement” (2004) for schanrgsistist zur zunkutti der arbit institute of study of labour, IZA DP, NO.1219.
3. Annual
economic service (2012-13), diractorate of economic and statistics government
of Chhattisgarh.
4. Censes
of India (2001), New Delhi: National ministry of home affairs, Govt. of india.
http: //en.Wikipedia.org/ wik/india shinig assed on September 01/2016.
5. Kakwami
N.A wogstaff and E. Van Benzeval (1998)
reply to recorded Wilkinson, Social ,46,567-579.
6. Kuznets, Simon (1963) “Quantitative Aspects of the
Economic Growth of Nations,”Economic Development and Cultural Change 11(2/II):
1-80.
7. Mallika,
V., 2012, “Agrarian Crisis in India: It’s Impact on Production and Export, an article/report in indiastat.com,
socio-economic voices, 1-8.
8. Metcalf, Gilbert E. (1999) “A Distributional Analysis of
an Environmental Tax Shift,”National Tax Journal 52(4): 655-681.
9. National
human development report (2001), New Delhi: planning commission government of
India,
10. Report
of the 12th finance commission, (2004-05), New Delhi Ministry of
finance government of india.
11. SRS
based aritage life table 1999-2003,1998-2002, 200-2006
12. Subramanian
swami (1997) measurement of inequality and poverty readers in economics oxford
university press.
13. UNDP
human development report, (2004), cultural liberty in today’s diverse world New
Delhi Oxford University.