Author(s):
Purnima Kumari, Kirti Jachak
Email(s):
purnimavaru@gmail.com , kirtijachak@gmail.com
Address:
Assistant Librarian, Pt Ravishankar ShuklaUniversity, Raipur, Chhattisgarh
Library Assistant-II, Pt Ravishankar ShuklaUniversity, Raipur, Chhattisgarh
*Corresponding Author: Purnima Kumari (purnimavaru@gmail.com)
Published In:
Volume - 28,
Issue - 2,
Year - 2022
DOI:
10.52228/JRUA.2022-28-2-1 
ABSTRACT:
The study highlights the Authorship pattern and collaborative measures of the 1692 Scholarly publications published in the Web of Science database for 21 years from 1989 to 2020. The study reveals the various significant aspects like the Collaborative index, collaborative coefficients, the correlation between authors and articles, and the degree of collaboration. There is a highly significant correlation found between articles and the authors. The highest collaborative index (3.32) and collaborative coefficient (0.64) were recorded in the year 2000. 1644 publications were co-authorship index while 48 publications single author index out of 1692 publications.
Cite this article:
Kumari and Jachak (2022). A study of Authorship Pattern and Collaborative Measures of Pt. Ravishankar Shukla University, Raipur Chhattisgarh. Journal of Ravishankar University (Part-A: SOCIAL-SCIENCE), 28(2), pp. 1-13.DOI: https://doi.org/10.52228/JRUA.2022-28-2-1
References:
Amsaveni, M, et
al. (2013). Authorship pattern and collaborative Reasearch in bioinformatics. International
journal of computer science and mobile computing,2(2), 230-238. Retrirved
August 2020.
Beck M.T. &
Gasper V.(1991). Scientometric
evaluation of the scientific performance at the faculty of Natural sciences,
Kossuth Lajos University, Debrecen, Hungary. Scientometrics,20(1), 37-54. Retrieved September
2020.
Bhardwaj, R.K. (2016). Ebola Virus: A Scientometric Study of
World Research. Journal of Scientific
research, 5(1), 34-42. Retrieved September 2020. from
<http://www.jscires.org/sites/default/files/10.5530jscires.5.1.6_0.pdf>.
Dundar, H., & Lewis, D. (1988). Determinant of Research
Productivity in Higher Education. Research in Higher Education, 39(6),
601-631. Retrieved October 2020, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40196313
Kumar S. (2019). Scientometric
study of Research productivity of ARIES,
Nainital. Library Philosophy and Practice
(e-journal). Retrieved October 2020, from https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1680/.
Lee, C. K.
(2003). A scientometric study of the
research performance of the Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology in
Singapore. Scientometrics, 56(1),
95-110. Retrieved September 2020, from,https://www.springee.com/journal/11192
S, Aswathy., & Gopikuttan, A. (2013). Productivity
pattern of universities in Kerala: A scientometric analysis. Annals of
Library and Information Studies, 176-185. Retrieved September 2020, from
http://nopr.niscair.res.in/
Sab, M. Chaman et al. (2016). Scientometric Study of the Research
Performance on Fishery: The Indian Perspective. Journal of Advances in Library and Information Science, 5(2), 337-341. Retrieved September 2020, from http://www.jalis.in
Patel, V. &
Thakur, N. (2018). Scientometric analysis of Research productivity: a case
study of National Environmental Engineering Research Institute, Nagpur. International Journal of Library Information
Network and Knowledge, 43-53.
Retrieved October 2020, from http://slp.org.in/IJLINK/volumes/IJLINK-V3I1-4.pdf.
P.K, Nidhisha & Sarangapani, R. (2019).
Research Productivity of National Institute of Technology, Calicut: A Study.
Reshaping of Librarianship, Innovations and Transformation ICRLIT, Calicut,
2019.
Yadav, Sunil Kumar et al. (2020). Research
Productivity of Mizometm University during 2004-2017: A Scientometric Study
Based on Indian Citation Index. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information
Technology, 40(9), 169-175. Retrieved September 2020, from DOI:
10.14429/djlit.40.3.15022