Social Work Intervention Strategies Addressing
Agrarian Unrest and Farmer Indebtedness: A Study in Bastar District,
Chhattisgarh
Digeshwar Sahu1*
1School of Studies
in Social Work, Shaheed Mahendra Karma University, Bastar, Jagdalpur, Chhattisgarh
India
Abstract
Agrarian unrest and farmer indebtedness
are major socio-economic challenges in India, leading to suicides, migration,
and social instability in rural areas. This research investigates the role of
social work interventions in mitigating these challenges, focusing on financial
literacy, psychosocial support, community mobilization, and policy advocacy. A
mixed-methods approach was employed, including structured surveys of 120
indebted farmer households, focus group discussions (FGDs) with farmer
cooperatives, and key informant interviews with NGO workers and local
government officials in Bastar district. Findings indicate that social work
strategies enhance financial awareness, strengthen coping mechanisms, and
promote community solidarity, but gaps remain in access to credit, grievance
redressal, and institutional support. The study recommends integrating social
work-led financial counselling, livelihood diversification, and participatory
farmer forums to address systemic issues effectively.
Keywords: Agrarian Unrest,
Farmer Indebtedness, Social Work Intervention, Rural Development, Financial
Literacy, Bastar
Introduction
Agrarian distress remains one of the most
persistent socio-economic challenges confronting rural India. Characterized by
high levels of indebtedness, recurrent crop failures, market volatility,
inadequate institutional credit, and weak social safety nets, this distress has
manifested in widespread farmer suicides, distress migration, and episodic
agrarian unrest. Nationally, the Situation Assessment Survey of Agricultural
Households (NSS 77th Round, 2019) reported that 50.2% of agricultural
households were indebted, with an average outstanding loan of ₹74,121 per
household. In Chhattisgarh, the figure stands lower at approximately 31% of
agricultural households indebted with an average outstanding loan of ₹21,443,
yet the state continues to report notable farmer suicides—73 cases in 2023
according to NCRB data—highlighting the intensity of vulnerability in
tribal-dominated regions.
Bastar district in Chhattisgarh
exemplifies these challenges. Predominantly tribal and rain-fed, with paddy as
the main crop, Bastar suffers from extremely low irrigation coverage,
fertilizer use, and productivity. Many households depend on forest produce and
subsistence farming, with annual household incomes often hovering around
₹52,000, of which agriculture contributes only about 34%. Limited access to
institutional credit forces reliance on informal moneylenders, perpetuating
debt traps. Historical data from 2017–2018 indicate farmer suicides in
Chhattisgarh, including Bastar division, were driven by debt burdens exceeding
₹6 lakh in some cases. Agrarian unrest has also surfaced through protests
against inadequate minimum support prices, crop insurance failures, and lack of
grievance mechanisms.
Social work, with its
person-in-environment perspective and emphasis on empowerment, advocacy, and
community organization, offers a unique framework to address these
multi-dimensional issues. Unlike purely economic interventions, social work
integrates psychosocial support, financial literacy, and collective action to
build resilience. This study, conducted in four high-indebtedness blocks of
Bastar, examines how targeted social work strategies can mitigate agrarian
unrest and indebtedness while filling critical gaps in existing rural
development programs.
Objectives
1. To assess the socio-economic and
psychological impact of indebtedness on farmers.
2. To evaluate the effectiveness of
existing social work interventions in addressing agrarian distress.
3. To identify gaps in institutional
support and policy implementation.
4. To recommend community-based social
work strategies to reduce indebtedness and agrarian unrest.
Literature Review
Extensive literature documents agrarian
distress in India. Rao and Saha (2016) highlight structural factors such as
market volatility and inadequate credit as drivers of rural livelihood crises.
Farmer indebtedness has been linked to mental health deterioration, with
studies showing elevated stress, anxiety, and suicidal ideation among indebted
smallholders (Singh & Sharma, 2019). In tribal regions like Bastar, low
land productivity, fragmented holdings, and dependence on informal credit
exacerbate vulnerability.
Social work scholarship emphasizes
participatory and strengths-based approaches. Desai (2018) underscores the
efficacy of community mobilization through cooperatives and farmer forums in
enhancing collective bargaining. Saleebey’s (2013) strengths perspective
advocates leveraging farmers’ resilience and indigenous knowledge rather than
deficit-focused models. However, few studies integrate financial literacy,
livelihood diversification, and policy advocacy within a unified social work
framework in remote tribal contexts like Bastar. This research addresses that
gap by combining quantitative indebtedness indicators with qualitative insights
into intervention effectiveness.
Methodology
Study Design: Descriptive,
exploratory, and mixed-methods research design.
Study Area: Four blocks in
Bastar district, Chhattisgarh, selected for high incidence of farmer
indebtedness and reported agrarian unrest.
Sample: Purposive
sampling of 120 indebted farmer households (primarily small and marginal tribal
farmers); 10 key informants (NGO workers, agricultural extension officers,
local leaders, and cooperative members). Additionally, four FGDs were conducted
with 8–10 farmers each.
Data Collection Tools:
Structured survey questionnaire covering financial status, debt levels, coping
strategies, access to credit, mental health indicators, and exposure to social
work interventions; semi-structured FGDs; key informant interviews.
Data Analysis: Quantitative data
analyzed using descriptive statistics and correlation via SPSS. Qualitative
data underwent thematic analysis. Ethical clearance was obtained; informed
consent secured.
Results
Table 1: Farmer Indebtedness and
Socio-Economic Indicators (n=120)
|
Indicator
|
% Households
|
Notes
|
|
Average Debt (informal sources dominant)
|
78%
|
Most farmers borrow from moneylenders at
high interest rates
|
|
Crop Failure in Past 3 Years
|
64%
|
Leads to income instability and debt
spiral
|
|
Access to Institutional Credit
|
39%
|
Limited reach of banks and cooperatives
|
|
Mental Health Issues (Stress, Anxiety)
|
48%
|
Self-reported during surveys and FGDs
|
|
Participation in Farmer Forums
|
27%
|
Low awareness of cooperatives or support
groups
|
|
Social Work Intervention Exposure
|
34%
|
Benefitted from counseling or financial
literacy sessions
|
Observation: High debt levels
combined with limited institutional support and social vulnerability create
conditions for agrarian unrest, highlighting the need for targeted social work
interventions.
Quantitative analysis showed a strong
positive correlation (r = 0.68, p < 0.01) between reliance on informal
credit and reported mental health issues. Farmers with exposure to social work
interventions reported 25% lower stress levels and 18% higher adoption of debt
management practices.
Table 2: Distribution of Debt Sources,
Coping Strategies, and Perceived Impact of Interventions (n=120)
|
Category
|
Sub-Category
|
% of Households
|
Key Observations
|
|
Primary Debt Source
|
Informal Moneylenders (Sahukars)
|
72%
|
High interest rates
(24-36% p.a.)
|
|
Institutional (Banks/Co-operatives)
|
22%
|
Low due to documentation barriers
|
|
Family/Friends/Other
|
6%
|
Short-term emergency loans
|
|
Coping Strategies Adopted
|
Reduced Household Expenditure
|
81%
|
Food insecurity and nutrition impact
|
|
Distress Migration (Seasonal)
|
57%
|
Family disruption and child education
loss
|
|
Sale of Assets (Land/Livestock)
|
34%
|
Long-term livelihood erosion
|
|
Seeking NGO/Government Aid
|
29%
|
Limited awareness and delays
|
|
Perceived Impact of Social Work
Interventions
|
Reduced Stress/Anxiety
|
62% (among exposed)
|
Through counseling sessions
|
|
Improved Debt Management Knowledge
|
55% (among exposed)
|
Financial literacy workshops
|
|
Enhanced Collective Bargaining
|
41% (among exposed)
|
Via farmer groups/cooperatives
|
|
No Significant Change
|
19% (among exposed)
|
Due to limited follow-up support
|
This table reveals that informal sources
dominate debt acquisition, while coping mechanisms often exacerbate
vulnerability. Among the 34% exposed to social work interventions, a majority
reported positive psychosocial and economic shifts, though overall coverage
remains low.
Qualitative themes from FGDs and
interviews reinforced these findings: “Debt Trap Cycle,” “Psychosocial
Distress,” “Limited Intervention Reach,” and “Community Solidarity Potential.”
Key informants highlighted poor implementation of government schemes like crop
insurance.
Key Findings
1.
Financial literacy and counselling
significantly reduce dependence on informal moneylenders and lower stress
levels among farmers.
2.
Community mobilization through farmer
groups and cooperatives strengthens collective bargaining and advocacy for
better prices and credit access.
3.
Social work interventions remain limited
in scale and geographic reach, underscoring the need for greater institutional
integration.
4.
Holistic approaches addressing economic,
psychosocial, and structural needs outperform purely financial or technical
interventions.
Discussion
The study’s findings align with national
trends. Low institutional credit access (39%) mirrors Chhattisgarh’s broader
pattern of under 40% agriculture GDP credit flow, pushing farmers toward
exploitative informal sources (IFAD, 2021). Crop failures (64%) exacerbate
indebtedness, consistent with Bastar’s rain-fed agriculture vulnerabilities.
Mental health issues (48%) echo broader agrarian distress literature linking
debt to suicides, with Chhattisgarh reporting persistent cases despite national
declines.
Social work interventions demonstrate
moderate effectiveness (34% exposure yielding positive outcomes), validating
the strengths perspective (Saleebey, 2013) and participatory models (Desai,
2018). However, gaps in policy implementation—poor grievance redressal and
limited farmer forum participation (27%)—highlight systemic barriers. Compared
to successful models like FPOs in Bastar (which increased tribal women’s income
by 55–493% through diversified activities), standalone financial aid proves
insufficient without psychosocial and community components.
Social Work Implications &
Recommendations
Social work must move beyond reactive
support to proactive, integrated strategies:
1. Financial
Counseling & Literacy Programs: Embed social
workers in village-level programs to deliver modules on savings, credit
options, debt restructuring, and digital banking. Partner with banks for
doorstep services.
2. Livelihood
Diversification: Promote agro-processing, animal husbandry, minor
millets, and forest-based enterprises through self-help groups and FPOs,
reducing mono-crop dependence.
3. Participatory
Farmer Forums: Facilitate regular dialogues between farmers, banks,
NGOs, and administration for grievance redressal and scheme monitoring.
4. Psychosocial
Support:
Train community health workers in basic counseling; integrate mental health
first-aid into extension services to address stress and prevent suicides.
5. Policy
Advocacy:
Social workers should advocate for tribal-specific credit norms, expanded crop
insurance, and convergence of schemes like PM-KISAN with livelihood programs.
These recommendations emphasize
collaboration among NGOs, government agencies, and universities to scale
interventions sustainably.
Conclusion
Agrarian unrest and farmer indebtedness in
Bastar are multi-dimensional, rooted in structural inequities and compounded by
psychosocial vulnerabilities. This study demonstrates that social work
strategies—integrating financial literacy, psychosocial support, and community
mobilization—offer a promising pathway to reduce vulnerability, build
resilience, and foster sustainable rural development. By addressing both
immediate coping needs and systemic gaps, social workers can play a pivotal
role in transforming agrarian distress into empowered rural livelihoods.
Collaborative engagement between academia, NGOs, government, and farmer
collectives is essential for long-term impact. Future research should evaluate
longitudinal outcomes of scaled social work models across similar tribal
regions. Agrarian unrest and farmer indebtedness in Bastar require holistic
social work interventions integrating financial literacy, psychosocial support,
and community mobilization. Collaborative efforts among NGOs, government, and social
workers can transform distress into resilient livelihoods. Future research
should evaluate longitudinal outcomes.
References
Rao, V., & Saha, S. (2016). Agrarian Distress and
Rural Livelihoods in India. Economic & Political Weekly, 51(42),
34–42.
Desai, R. (2018). Participatory Approaches in Rural
Development. Indian Journal of Social Work, 79(3), 210–228.
Singh, A., & Sharma, P. (2019). Farmer
Indebtedness and Mental Health: A Social Work Perspective. Journal of Rural
Development, 38(2), 145–160.
Government of India. (2021). Report on Farmer Suicides
and Debt Alleviation Schemes. Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers
Welfare.
Saleebey, D. (2013). The Strengths Perspective in
Social Work Practice. Pearson Education.
National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB). (2024).
Accidental Deaths & Suicides in India 2023. Ministry of Home Affairs.
NSSO. (2021). Situation Assessment of Agricultural
Households: NSS 77th Round.
IFAD. (2021). Chhattisgarh Inclusive Rural &
Accelerated Agriculture Growth Project (CHIRAAG) Design Report.
PRADAN. (2020). Agriculture Interventions with the
Tribals in Bastar.