Article in HTML

Author(s): Digeshwar Sahu

Email(s): digesh.sahu98@gmail.com

Address: Digeshwar Sahu 1School of Studies in Social Work, Shaheed Mahendra Karma University, Bastar, Jagdalpur, Chhattisgarh India
*Corresponding Author: digesh.sahu98@gmail.com

Published In:   Volume - 32,      Issue - 2,     Year - 2026


Cite this article:
Social Work Intervention Strategies Addressing Agrarian Unrest and Farmer Indebtedness: A Study in Bastar District, Chhattisgarh. Journal of Ravishankar University (Part-A: SOCIAL-SCIENCE), 32(2), pp.195-200. DOI:https://doi.org/10.52228/JRUA.2026-32-2-19



Social Work Intervention Strategies Addressing Agrarian Unrest and Farmer Indebtedness: A Study in Bastar District, Chhattisgarh

Digeshwar Sahu1*

1School of Studies in Social Work, Shaheed Mahendra Karma University, Bastar, Jagdalpur, Chhattisgarh India 

*Corresponding Author digesh.sahu98@gmail.com

Abstract 

Agrarian unrest and farmer indebtedness are major socio-economic challenges in India, leading to suicides, migration, and social instability in rural areas. This research investigates the role of social work interventions in mitigating these challenges, focusing on financial literacy, psychosocial support, community mobilization, and policy advocacy. A mixed-methods approach was employed, including structured surveys of 120 indebted farmer households, focus group discussions (FGDs) with farmer cooperatives, and key informant interviews with NGO workers and local government officials in Bastar district. Findings indicate that social work strategies enhance financial awareness, strengthen coping mechanisms, and promote community solidarity, but gaps remain in access to credit, grievance redressal, and institutional support. The study recommends integrating social work-led financial counselling, livelihood diversification, and participatory farmer forums to address systemic issues effectively. 

Keywords: Agrarian Unrest, Farmer Indebtedness, Social Work Intervention, Rural Development, Financial Literacy, Bastar 

Introduction 

Agrarian distress remains one of the most persistent socio-economic challenges confronting rural India. Characterized by high levels of indebtedness, recurrent crop failures, market volatility, inadequate institutional credit, and weak social safety nets, this distress has manifested in widespread farmer suicides, distress migration, and episodic agrarian unrest. Nationally, the Situation Assessment Survey of Agricultural Households (NSS 77th Round, 2019) reported that 50.2% of agricultural households were indebted, with an average outstanding loan of ₹74,121 per household. In Chhattisgarh, the figure stands lower at approximately 31% of agricultural households indebted with an average outstanding loan of ₹21,443, yet the state continues to report notable farmer suicides—73 cases in 2023 according to NCRB data—highlighting the intensity of vulnerability in tribal-dominated regions. 

Bastar district in Chhattisgarh exemplifies these challenges. Predominantly tribal and rain-fed, with paddy as the main crop, Bastar suffers from extremely low irrigation coverage, fertilizer use, and productivity. Many households depend on forest produce and subsistence farming, with annual household incomes often hovering around ₹52,000, of which agriculture contributes only about 34%. Limited access to institutional credit forces reliance on informal moneylenders, perpetuating debt traps. Historical data from 2017–2018 indicate farmer suicides in Chhattisgarh, including Bastar division, were driven by debt burdens exceeding ₹6 lakh in some cases. Agrarian unrest has also surfaced through protests against inadequate minimum support prices, crop insurance failures, and lack of grievance mechanisms. 

Social work, with its person-in-environment perspective and emphasis on empowerment, advocacy, and community organization, offers a unique framework to address these multi-dimensional issues. Unlike purely economic interventions, social work integrates psychosocial support, financial literacy, and collective action to build resilience. This study, conducted in four high-indebtedness blocks of Bastar, examines how targeted social work strategies can mitigate agrarian unrest and indebtedness while filling critical gaps in existing rural development programs. 

Objectives 

1. To assess the socio-economic and psychological impact of indebtedness on farmers. 

2. To evaluate the effectiveness of existing social work interventions in addressing agrarian distress. 

3. To identify gaps in institutional support and policy implementation. 

4. To recommend community-based social work strategies to reduce indebtedness and agrarian unrest. 

Literature Review 

Extensive literature documents agrarian distress in India. Rao and Saha (2016) highlight structural factors such as market volatility and inadequate credit as drivers of rural livelihood crises. Farmer indebtedness has been linked to mental health deterioration, with studies showing elevated stress, anxiety, and suicidal ideation among indebted smallholders (Singh & Sharma, 2019). In tribal regions like Bastar, low land productivity, fragmented holdings, and dependence on informal credit exacerbate vulnerability. 

Social work scholarship emphasizes participatory and strengths-based approaches. Desai (2018) underscores the efficacy of community mobilization through cooperatives and farmer forums in enhancing collective bargaining. Saleebey’s (2013) strengths perspective advocates leveraging farmers’ resilience and indigenous knowledge rather than deficit-focused models. However, few studies integrate financial literacy, livelihood diversification, and policy advocacy within a unified social work framework in remote tribal contexts like Bastar. This research addresses that gap by combining quantitative indebtedness indicators with qualitative insights into intervention effectiveness. 

Methodology 

Study Design: Descriptive, exploratory, and mixed-methods research design. 

Study Area: Four blocks in Bastar district, Chhattisgarh, selected for high incidence of farmer indebtedness and reported agrarian unrest. 

Sample: Purposive sampling of 120 indebted farmer households (primarily small and marginal tribal farmers); 10 key informants (NGO workers, agricultural extension officers, local leaders, and cooperative members). Additionally, four FGDs were conducted with 8–10 farmers each. 

Data Collection Tools: Structured survey questionnaire covering financial status, debt levels, coping strategies, access to credit, mental health indicators, and exposure to social work interventions; semi-structured FGDs; key informant interviews. 

Data Analysis: Quantitative data analyzed using descriptive statistics and correlation via SPSS. Qualitative data underwent thematic analysis. Ethical clearance was obtained; informed consent secured. 

 

Results 

Table 1: Farmer Indebtedness and Socio-Economic Indicators (n=120)

Indicator

% Households

Notes

Average Debt (informal sources dominant)

78%

Most farmers borrow from moneylenders at high interest rates

Crop Failure in Past 3 Years

64%

Leads to income instability and debt spiral

Access to Institutional Credit

39%

Limited reach of banks and cooperatives

Mental Health Issues (Stress, Anxiety)

48%

Self-reported during surveys and FGDs

Participation in Farmer Forums

27%

Low awareness of cooperatives or support groups

Social Work Intervention Exposure

34%

Benefitted from counseling or financial literacy sessions

 

Observation: High debt levels combined with limited institutional support and social vulnerability create conditions for agrarian unrest, highlighting the need for targeted social work interventions. 

Quantitative analysis showed a strong positive correlation (r = 0.68, p < 0.01) between reliance on informal credit and reported mental health issues. Farmers with exposure to social work interventions reported 25% lower stress levels and 18% higher adoption of debt management practices. 

Table 2: Distribution of Debt Sources, Coping Strategies, and Perceived Impact of Interventions (n=120)

Category

Sub-Category

% of Households

Key Observations

Primary Debt Source

Informal Moneylenders (Sahukars)

72%

High interest rates

(24-36% p.a.)

Institutional (Banks/Co-operatives)

22%

Low due to documentation barriers

Family/Friends/Other

6%

Short-term emergency loans

Coping Strategies Adopted

Reduced Household Expenditure

81%

Food insecurity and nutrition impact

Distress Migration (Seasonal)

57%

Family disruption and child education loss

Sale of Assets (Land/Livestock)

34%

Long-term livelihood erosion

Seeking NGO/Government Aid

29%

Limited awareness and delays

Perceived Impact of Social Work Interventions

Reduced Stress/Anxiety

62% (among exposed)

Through counseling sessions

Improved Debt Management Knowledge

55% (among exposed)

Financial literacy workshops

Enhanced Collective Bargaining

41% (among exposed)

Via farmer groups/cooperatives

No Significant Change

19% (among exposed)

Due to limited follow-up support

 

This table reveals that informal sources dominate debt acquisition, while coping mechanisms often exacerbate vulnerability. Among the 34% exposed to social work interventions, a majority reported positive psychosocial and economic shifts, though overall coverage remains low.

Qualitative themes from FGDs and interviews reinforced these findings: “Debt Trap Cycle,” “Psychosocial Distress,” “Limited Intervention Reach,” and “Community Solidarity Potential.” Key informants highlighted poor implementation of government schemes like crop insurance.

Key Findings 

1.     Financial literacy and counselling significantly reduce dependence on informal moneylenders and lower stress levels among farmers.

2.     Community mobilization through farmer groups and cooperatives strengthens collective bargaining and advocacy for better prices and credit access.

3.     Social work interventions remain limited in scale and geographic reach, underscoring the need for greater institutional integration.

4.     Holistic approaches addressing economic, psychosocial, and structural needs outperform purely financial or technical interventions.

Discussion 

The study’s findings align with national trends. Low institutional credit access (39%) mirrors Chhattisgarh’s broader pattern of under 40% agriculture GDP credit flow, pushing farmers toward exploitative informal sources (IFAD, 2021). Crop failures (64%) exacerbate indebtedness, consistent with Bastar’s rain-fed agriculture vulnerabilities. Mental health issues (48%) echo broader agrarian distress literature linking debt to suicides, with Chhattisgarh reporting persistent cases despite national declines.

Social work interventions demonstrate moderate effectiveness (34% exposure yielding positive outcomes), validating the strengths perspective (Saleebey, 2013) and participatory models (Desai, 2018). However, gaps in policy implementation—poor grievance redressal and limited farmer forum participation (27%)—highlight systemic barriers. Compared to successful models like FPOs in Bastar (which increased tribal women’s income by 55–493% through diversified activities), standalone financial aid proves insufficient without psychosocial and community components.

 

Social Work Implications & Recommendations 

Social work must move beyond reactive support to proactive, integrated strategies:

1.     Financial Counseling & Literacy Programs: Embed social workers in village-level programs to deliver modules on savings, credit options, debt restructuring, and digital banking. Partner with banks for doorstep services.

2.     Livelihood Diversification: Promote agro-processing, animal husbandry, minor millets, and forest-based enterprises through self-help groups and FPOs, reducing mono-crop dependence.

3.     Participatory Farmer Forums: Facilitate regular dialogues between farmers, banks, NGOs, and administration for grievance redressal and scheme monitoring.

4.     Psychosocial Support: Train community health workers in basic counseling; integrate mental health first-aid into extension services to address stress and prevent suicides.

5.     Policy Advocacy: Social workers should advocate for tribal-specific credit norms, expanded crop insurance, and convergence of schemes like PM-KISAN with livelihood programs.

These recommendations emphasize collaboration among NGOs, government agencies, and universities to scale interventions sustainably.

 Conclusion 

Agrarian unrest and farmer indebtedness in Bastar are multi-dimensional, rooted in structural inequities and compounded by psychosocial vulnerabilities. This study demonstrates that social work strategies—integrating financial literacy, psychosocial support, and community mobilization—offer a promising pathway to reduce vulnerability, build resilience, and foster sustainable rural development. By addressing both immediate coping needs and systemic gaps, social workers can play a pivotal role in transforming agrarian distress into empowered rural livelihoods. Collaborative engagement between academia, NGOs, government, and farmer collectives is essential for long-term impact. Future research should evaluate longitudinal outcomes of scaled social work models across similar tribal regions. Agrarian unrest and farmer indebtedness in Bastar require holistic social work interventions integrating financial literacy, psychosocial support, and community mobilization. Collaborative efforts among NGOs, government, and social workers can transform distress into resilient livelihoods. Future research should evaluate longitudinal outcomes. 

References 

Rao, V., & Saha, S. (2016). Agrarian Distress and Rural Livelihoods in India. Economic & Political Weekly, 51(42), 34–42. 

Desai, R. (2018). Participatory Approaches in Rural Development. Indian Journal of Social Work, 79(3), 210–228. 

Singh, A., & Sharma, P. (2019). Farmer Indebtedness and Mental Health: A Social Work Perspective. Journal of Rural Development, 38(2), 145–160. 

Government of India. (2021). Report on Farmer Suicides and Debt Alleviation Schemes. Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare. 

Saleebey, D. (2013). The Strengths Perspective in Social Work Practice. Pearson Education. 

National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB). (2024). Accidental Deaths & Suicides in India 2023. Ministry of Home Affairs. 

NSSO. (2021). Situation Assessment of Agricultural Households: NSS 77th Round. 

IFAD. (2021). Chhattisgarh Inclusive Rural & Accelerated Agriculture Growth Project (CHIRAAG) Design Report.

PRADAN. (2020). Agriculture Interventions with the Tribals in Bastar.




Related Images:

Recomonded Articles:

Author(s): Nitesh Kumar Mishra; Anshu Mala Tirkey; Baleshwar Kumar Besra

DOI: 10.52228/JRUA.2023-29-2-1         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Amitesh Kumar Singh; Namrata Singh

DOI: 10.52228/JRUA.2025-31-2-4         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): A Kalaimathi

DOI:         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): L. S. Gajpal

DOI:         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): P.C. Agarwal; Z.T. Khan

DOI:         Access: Open Access Read More