Digital Influencers and Electronic word of
mouth (eWom) Effects on Green Purchase intention among Students
1Abhinav Agrawal, 2Minal
Shah, 3Dharmendra Kumar Gangeshwer
1,2,3Bhilai Institute of Technology, Chhattisgarh, India.
*Corresponding Author: skabhinava@gmail.com
Abstract
This research
investigates green purchase intention among university students through an
extended Theory of Planned Behavior with digital related variables including
influencer credibility, electronic word of mouth and social media engagement. A
cross-sectional questionnaire-based study was carried out among 512 students of
various universities located in Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Data were processed through
Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Modeling. The results
demonstrate that attitude, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control,
influencer credibility, electronic word-of-mouth, and social media engagement
are significant predictors of green purchase intention. Also, Electronic word
of mouth significantly mediates the relationship between influencer credibility
and subjective norms. The moderation analyses revealed that the effects of
social media engagement were stronger among course level whereas
gender differences were detected but not consistent in direction. This research
advances the literature by applying digital aspects of behavior to extend the
Theory of Planned Behavior within the context of the developing world and
delivers practical applications for those seeking to effectively target youth,
consumers, and students globally for sustainable consumption in part via
digital means.
Keywords: Green purchase intention, University students, Digital
influencers, eWOM, Extended TPB, Chhattisgarh, SEM analysis.
1. Introduction
The increasing global
focus on sustainable consumption has escalated academic interest in green
purchase intention (GPI), especially with regard to young consumers. In India,
this segment holds a pivotal impetus for the prospective sustainable markets with
43 million university students (AISHE 2023–24). Even though environmental
consciousness and green exposure are rising among students, their
actual purchase of green products is still hindered by intention–behavior gap.
This gap is more significant in underdeveloped and tier-2 states like
Chattisgarh where green consumption behavior is limited by affordability
issues, availability of products, and distrust in digital information sources.
Changing the way they
are received, interpreted and acted upon, young consumers are particularly
influenced by recent developments in digital ecosystems, namely in the
explosive growth of social media platforms such as Instagram. In the age of the
digital influencer, the electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) effect and social media
engagement (SME) have become influential variables on consumer purchasing
decisions. Although these elements have been studied separately in
prior research, their combined influence in a comprehensive behavioural model
is still unknown, especially in the developing world. The Theory of Planned
Behavior (TPB) (Ajzen, 1991) has been employed extensively to predict green
purchase intention with its components: attitude, subjective norms, and
perceived behavioral control. Nevertheless, conventional TPB frameworks tend to
neglect the interactive effect of digital media, which have become vital in
student decision-making. While some recent research works have endeavoured to
extend TPB by adding digital variables, these works are predominantly focused
on developed or metropolitan context, there exists a significant contextual
void when it comes to understanding of digi-driven green behavior in tier-2
cities and among student population.
This research
overcomes these shortcomings by developing and testing an extended TPB model
that includes digital factors–influencer credibility, electronic word-of-mouth
(eWOM), and social media engagement (SME)–as an integrated model. In contrast
to earlier studies, this study presents a double mechanism of mediation and
moderation, with eWOM as a mediator the relationship between influencer
credibility and subjective norms and demographic variables such as course level
and gender as a moderator. In this way, the approach provides a more
differentiated and realistic view of student conduct in the digital age.
In addition, this study
provides a contextual novelty as it addresses on university students from
Raipur, Chhattisgarh- a regional stronghold in green marketing literature.
By applying Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to primary data obtained from
512 students, the paper corroborates the extended model and reveals specific
regional behavioural traits, namely that of pronounced peer influence
(subjective norms) and financial limitation (perceived behavioural control).
To sum up,
the contribution of the study to the existing body of knowledge can be marked
three-fold:
(1) the adaptation of
the TPB model to include digital influence variables,
(2) the investigation of
mediating and moderating effects in one model, and
(3) the context of a
tier-2 city in India, thereby adding to a handful of empirical studies in the
developing context.
Theoretically, these
contributions enhance and for marketers, policy makers and academic researchers
who have a desire to influence sustainable consumption via digital track
prospects for action.
1.2 Theoretical Framework
The present study is based on Icek Ajzen's Theory of
Planned Behavior (TPB) (1991), which continues to be the popular theoretical
model for understanding human behavior within a decision-making context.
TPB suggests that behavior intention is influenced by three main factors:
attitude (ATT) toward the behavior, subjective norms (SN), and perceived
behavioral control (PBC) over performing the behavior. In the green consumption
context, these constructs describe how a purchase intention is influenced by a
personal assessment of the sustainable product, the social influence, and what
is affordable/accessible.
Nonetheless, the classical TPB model was conceived
in the era of pre-internet and fails to fully reflect the impact of current
digital milieu on consumer behaviours, as the latter are further influenced by
their online presence. As social media platforms are rapidly proliferating,
particularly among university students, decision-making is more socially
embedded and digitally mediated. Accordingly, TPB needs to be extended with
relevant digital constructs in order to remain valid in modern contexts.
To overcome this shortcoming, the current research
brings three dominant digital variables into the TPB model:
Influencer
Credibility (IC):
Based on source credibility theory, influencer
credibility is defined as the level of perceived expertise, trustworthiness,
and attractiveness of social media influencers. As in the real world, opinion
leaders demonstrate their credibility and influence through the internet, among
which are influencers products awareness and consumer attitudes toward green
products. Trustworthy sources of information can decrease uncertainty as well
as increase trust, where both attitudes and behavioral intentions are positive outcomes
of such influences.
Electronic Word-of-Mouth (eWOM):
The term eWOM is related with online activity on
which consumers exchange their thoughts, opinions, reviews, and recommendations
about particular products or services. It has a double function, an informative
and a normative one. A good eWOM can not only improve the consumer attitude,
but also enhance the subjective norm as it induces a sense of social consensus,
thus it is an important mechanism for consumers in the digital world.
Social Media Engagement (SME):
Social media engagement represents user
participation in green content in the form of likes, shares, comments and even
content creation. This antecede shows how intense green cognition and
emotion were since involvement is said to foster both cognition and affect
leading to the behavioral intention. Based on these dimensions, this paper
builds the extended TPB model, in which influencer credibility, eWOM and social
media engagement are independent variables and green purchase intention is the
dependent variable, and influencer credibility, eWOM and SME affect green
purchase intention directly and indirectly through TPB components (ATT, SN,
PBC).
The present theoretical framework contributes to
this line of research by positioning eWOM as an intermediary mechanism between
influencer credibility and subjective norms. This is the stage at which
influencer messages converge with personal interactions and are validated as
well as amplified to influence magnitude of social pressure and behavioral
intent.
Furthermore, course level (undergraduate
vs postgraduate) and gender are considered as moderating variables in this
research model to better understand variations in the digital influence and
decision making of student consumers. These moderating variables illustrate how
the strength of some of the relationships within the model are influenced by
demographic differences.
In sum, the extended framework provides a richer and
more contextually relevant account of green purchase intention by integrating
orthodox behavioural theory with modern digital theory. The study meets recent
demands for unifying behavioural theories with the dynamics of digital
marketing view emerging markets and student public as focal-point.
2. Literature Review
1.Ajzen, (1991)Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) The
Theory of Planned Behavior was suggested to predict human behavior, describing
the effect of attitude toward behavior, subjective norms, and perceived
behavioral control on behavioral intention. There are substantial evidence,
from meta-analyses of predictors of intention (indicating) how the attitude,
subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control (PBC) constructs influence
behavior, and how intention and perceived control predict behavior.
2.Paul et al. (2016) examined the applicability of TPB in
predicting green product consumption.
the objective was to analyze determinants of green purchase intention using
TPB. Attitude was found to be the strongest predictor, followed by subjective
norms and perceived behavioral control.
3.Yadav and Pathak (2015) focused on young consumers’
green purchasing behavior.
study was conducted to study TPB variables in the context of youth.
and it was concluded in the study that Attitude and subjective norms significantly
influence purchase intention among young consumers.
4.Han et al. (2010) applied TPB in eco-friendly
decision-making and aim of the study was To understand consumer behavior in
environmentally responsible contexts and it was found that Subjective norms
strongly influence intentions, especially in socially sensitive decisions.
5.Chen and Tung (2014) extended TPB by incorporating
environmental concern to improve TPB’s explanatory power and it was resulted
that Environmental concern significantly enhances the predictive ability of
TPB.
6.Chen (2010) investigated factors influencing green
brand equity with objective of examine
drivers of green purchasing behavior and it was found that Trust and perceived
value significantly enhance green purchase intention.
7.Joshi and Rahman (2015) conducted a comprehensive
review of green purchase behavior to identify key determinants of green
purchasing. It was resulted that Environmental knowledge and awareness are
critical factors influencing behavior.
8.Chen and Chang (2012) studied the role of trust in
green marketing to analyze how trust
affects green purchase intention and it was reported that Trust reduces
uncertainty and increases consumer willingness to purchase green products.
9.Nekmahmud et al. (2022) explored green behavior among
young consumers to analyze sustainability awareness among youth it was
concluded that Social media exposure significantly increases green purchase
intention.
10.Cheung and Thadani (2012) analyzed the influence of
eWOM on consumer decisions with objective to review the impact of online
reviews in his study he concluded that eWOM significantly affects consumer
attitudes and purchase decisions.
11.King et al. (2014) examined online review systems for
understanding how consumers use online
information and it was found that Consumers rely heavily on peer reviews before
making purchase decisions.
12.Ismagilova et al. (2017) studied eWOM communication to
explore the effectiveness of eWOM.
and It was conclude that eWOM reduces perceived risk and builds trust in
online environments.
13.Filieri (2015) investigated determinants of eWOM
usefulness.
the aim of the research was to identify factors influencing helpfulness
of online reviews.
and it was concluded Information quality significantly impacts consumer
perception and decision-making.
14.Erkan and Evans (2016) examined eWOM in social medi to
analyze the role of information
credibility and usefulness it was observed that Information usefulness mediates
the relationship between eWOM and purchase intention.
15.Leong et al. (2022) explored social media eWOM. with
objective to examine digital
communication impact on consumer behavior and the finding suggested that eWOM has both direct and indirect effects on
purchase intention.
16.Sardar et al. (2021) studied eWOM adoption behavior to
analyze factors influencing online information adoption and it was revealed
that Credibility and relevance strongly affect adoption behavior.
17.Ohanian (1990) developed a credibility scale to
measure source credibility. He concluded that Trustworthiness, expertise, and
attractiveness are key credibility dimensions.
18.Djafarova and Rushworth (2017) examined influencer
marketing.
with objective to analyze
Instagram influencers’ impact and it was concluded that Influencers
significantly affect purchase intention due to perceived authenticity.
19.Lou and Yuan (2019) studied influencer marketing
effectiveness to evaluate how influencers affect consumer behavior and
it was found that Influencer credibility positively impacts attitudes and
purchase intention.
20.Freberg et al. (2011) explored social media
influencers. to identify characteristics of influencers study found that
Influencers act as opinion leaders shaping consumer perceptions.
21.Brodie et al. (2013) studied customer engagement to
understand engagement in digital platforms and it was concluded that Engagement
enhances emotional connection and behavioral intention.
22.Harrigan et al. (2017) analyzed social media
interactions to examine engagement’s impact on consumer behavior and it was
suggested in this study that Higher engagement leads to stronger purchase
intention.
23.Parveen and Chaudhary (2025) investigated the
influence of social media eWOM in green buying.
To test whether attitude and subjective norms act as
mediators of eWOM on intention for green purchase. The investigation revealed
that attitude and subjective norms were partial mediators, indicating that eWOM
indirectly affects purchase intention via psychological components.
24.Zaman, Basith, and Alam (2024) studied eWOM and
perceived value in green consumption to investigate the impact of eWOM and
perceived value on green purchase intention. eWOM is well-established as
increasing purchase intention, especially when moderated by factors captured as
trust and perceived value.
25.Ramdhani et al. (2025) examined eWOM in mobile
commerce by adapting IAM to explore the
impact of quality, quantity and credibility of eWOM on purchase intention the
study revealed that eWOM quality and credibility have a positive and
significant effect on perceived usefulness, which in turn has a positive and
significant effect on trust and purchase intention.
26.Prayogo and Adiwijaya (2025) investigated
green influencers to analyze the influence of green influencers on purchase
intention through TPB constructs and the finding indicated that Influencers had
a significant positive effect on attitude and subjective norms, and it
concluded that higher green purchase intention would be attained.
27.Muna, Mitariani, and Telagawathi (2025) studied
influencer marketing in eco-friendly consumption to examine direct and indirect
effects of influencer marketing on green purchase intention and it was resulted
that Influencer marketing indirectly affects purchase intention through
credibility and emotional responses rather than direct influence.
28.Vishrutha and Thiruchelvi (2025) analyzed the role of
green influencers in developing countries with objective to examine how green
influencers shape consumer behavior.
result of the study suggested that Green influencers significantly impact
attitudes and purchase intentions, especially in emerging markets.
29.Kohar and Bansal (2026) studied social media influence
on green packaging decisions.
for examine the mediating role of eWOM in social media influence it is
resulted in this study that Social media significantly affects green purchase
intention, with eWOM acting as a strong mediator.
30.Handranata and Kalila (2025) examined influencer
perception and consumer behavior to analyze how attitudes toward influencers
affect purchase intention it was concluded that Influencer perception
significantly influences purchase behavior through brand attitude and
intention.
2.1 Research Gaps and
Conceptual Model
After studying various literatures,
it was found that there were very few regional based studies specially in
Chhattisgarh no such study was performed further it was also analyzed that
there is limited studies which focus on young consumers and digital influences
it was also seen that electronic word of mount (ewom) with behavioral theories
is still limited. It was felt that there is need for moderating and mediating
effect for further exploration. Keeping in mind all these gaps this study focuses
on fulfillment of these gaps.
Conceptual Model
Theoretical foundation: The
study's conceptual model is based on the TPB and enriched by including digital
influence constructs to capture modern consumer behavior. Attitude (ATT),
subjective norms (SN), and perceived behavioral control (PBC) are the main
predictors of green purchase intention (GPI) in this model.
Influencer credibility (IC),
electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM), social media engagement (SME) and green
purchase intention (GPI) are the focal exogenous variables in the model that
exert direct and indirect effect (through TPB constructs) on the GPI. These
digital factors reflect the influence of online, peer-to-peer and
influencer-based persuasion on students.
A core aspect of the model is the
mediating role of eWOM between influencer credibility and subjective
norms, while the latter was positively and significantly related to subjective
norms. This is representative of how influencer-created content becomes legitimized
and accepted socially through peer reviews and social conversations online,
ultimately leading to greater normative pressures on individuals.
In addition, the model introduces
moderating variables course level and gender to test the extent to which the
relationships vary between different groups of students. These moderators
determine how demographic factors shape one’s susceptibility to the digital and
social influences. In conclusion, the conceptual model outlined above can be
denoted as follows:
In summary, the proposed conceptual
model can be represented as:
IC, eWOM, SME → ATT, SN, PBC → GPI
with eWOM acting as a mediator (IC → SN) and course level and gender acting as
moderators.
Figure
1: Conceptual Model
2.3 Research
Objectives and Hypotheses
Objectives:
To
validate the extended Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) integrated with digital
constructs in explaining students’ green purchase intentions.
To
examine the mediating role of electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) in the
relationship between influencer credibility and subjective norms, and its
subsequent impact on green purchase intention.
To
analyze the moderating effects of course of study and gender on students’ green
purchase intentions.
To
identify region-specific barriers affecting green purchase intentions among
students in Chhattisgarh.
Hypotheses
The hypotheses of
the conceptual model of the research paper are stated below in full words
represented from the given notation.
Core TPB Hypotheses
(H1)
• H1a: Attitude towards green
products has a positive effect on green purchase intention.
• H1b: Subjective norms have a
positive effect on green buying intention.
• H1c: Perceived behavioral
control has a positive effect on green purchase intention.
Digital Direct Effects (H2)
• H2a: Influencer
credibility has a significant and positive effect on green purchase intention.
• H2b: Electronic
word-of-mouth has a significant and positive effect on green purchase
intention.
• H2c: Social media
engagement significantly and positively affects green purchase intention.
•Mediation Hypothesis
(H3)
• H3: EWOM mediates the
association between influencer credibility and subjective norms, and this
further influences green purchase intention.
Moderation Hypotheses
(H4-H5)
• H4: The relationship between
social media engagement and green purchase intention is strengthened by course
level (undergraduate vs postgraduate) and this augmentation of relationship is
more evident for postgraduates.
• H5: The relationship between
influencer credibility and attitude towards green products is moderated by
gender, with a positive effect which is stronger for female students.
3. Research Methodology
3.1 Population and Sampling
A quantitative, cross-sectional survey design is adopted in the proposed
research to examine the extended TPB model with digital variables in a
university student context in Chhattisgarh. This treatment is standard for
behavioral intentions studies with SEM.
3.2 Study Population and Sampling
The target group was all full-time undergraduate and
postgraduate students aged 18-25 years from various universities and its
affiliated colleges. A multi-stage sampling procedure was utilized to select 10
colleges/universities, 3 departments in each colleges and 20 students in each
department (n=600) responses were expected. Data were collected through Google
Forms and paper-based questionnaires in November and December of 2025, with 544
responses (94% valid rate 50 incomplete or straight-lined responses were
discarded), the final sample size was 512.
A total of 58% of the sample population were females
and 62% were undergraduates (38% postgraduates), 71% from commerce/science
stream, 66% received pocket money Amt of ₹3k-7k and 84% were daily Instagram
users for1+hr.
3.3 Measurement Scales
40 items, 7-point Likert, bilingual (English/Hindi).
Student-adapted scales:
|
Construct
|
Items
|
α (Pilot n=75)
|
Sample Item
|
Source
|
|
IC
|
6
|
0.94
|
"Raipur influencers understand student
budgets"
|
Ohanian (1990)[8]
|
|
eWOM
|
5
|
0.92
|
"Positive student reviews on Instagram
greens"
|
Goyette et al.[23]
|
|
SME
|
5
|
0.93
|
"Like/share green product Reels"
|
Kim & Johnson[10]
|
|
ATT
|
5
|
0.95
|
"Green products improve my health"
|
Paul et al. (2016)[7]
|
|
SN
|
4
|
0.91
|
"Hostel mates buy green products"
|
Ajzen (1991)[29]
|
|
PBC
|
5
|
0.93
|
"Green products fit my pocket money"
|
Paul et al.[7]
|
|
GPI
|
5
|
0.96
|
"Will buy green cosmetics next month"
|
Yadav & Pathak[30]
|
Table-1 Measurement Scales
3.4 Analytical Procedures
Analysis was conducted in stages with the SPSS version 28
software for prior descriptives, EFA; KMO=0.95, reliability analyses, and
correlations. The CFA and SEM were conducted using AMOS 28, which presented
good model fit (CFA: ²/df=2.08, CFI=0.97, RMSEA=0.046; SEM: ²/df=2.18,
CFI=0.96, RMSEA=0.048). Advanced tests involved using PROCESS (Model 14) with
10,000 bootstraps (version 4.3) for mediation and moderation. Robustness was
ensured with the diagnostics including Harman’s single-factor test (<50% of
the variance for the CMB), marker variable (r=0.07), normality (skewness <
2), multicollinearity (VIF< 2.1), and statistical power (f 2 = 0.22). The
multi-faceted approach described above offers a firmer basis for testing the
validity of digital extensions to TPB in a context of students from an emergent
market.
4. Results and Discussion
4.1 Descriptive Statistics
Student GPI M=4.42 (SD=1.07); highest SME (M=4.78),
lowest PBC (M=3.72).
Table-2
Descriptive Statistics
|
Construct
|
Mean
|
SD
|
Skewness
|
Kurtosis
|
Instagram Exposure
|
|
IC
|
4.51
|
1.09
|
-0.92
|
-0.38
|
68% (Reels)
|
|
eWOM
|
4.35
|
1.12
|
-0.81
|
-0.45
|
72% (Stories)
|
|
SME
|
4.78
|
1.05
|
-1.15
|
0.72
|
84% (Feed)[24]
|
|
ATT
|
5.18
|
0.94
|
-1.34
|
1.02
|
—
|
|
SN
|
4.58
|
1.10
|
-0.88
|
-0.52
|
66% (Hostel groups)
|
|
PBC
|
3.72
|
1.28
|
-0.32
|
-0.71
|
—
|
|
GPI
|
4.42
|
1.07
|
-0.76
|
-0.29
|
—
|
The respondents showed a moderate positive attitude
toward green product purchasing (GPI: M=4.42, SD=1.07), and social media was
the dominant factor in the construct (SME: M=4.78, SD=1.05), suggesting
students' frequent use of Instagram (84% daily for more than 1 hour, mainly
Reels at 68%). The perceived behavioral control was the lowest mean (PBC:
M=3.72, SD=1.28), indicating that many students considered price as the
substantial obstacle since it is their pocket money (₹3k-7k). Attitude was
significantly positive (ATT: M=5.18, SD=0.94), which may be due to perceptions
of health in green cosmetics. Data were normally distributed (skewness <2,
kurtosis <2) to proceed with the advanced models.
4.2 Measurement Model Assessment
EFA: KMO=0.95, Bartlett p<0.001, 7 factors (77.9% var). CFA: χ²(548)=1140.6, χ²/df=2.08, CFI=0.97, RMSEA=0.046.
Reliability/Validity:
Table-3 Reliability/Validity Testing
|
Construct
|
α
|
CR
|
AVE
|
MSV
|
√AVE
|
|
IC
|
0.94
|
0.95
|
0.76
|
0.51
|
0.87
|
|
eWOM
|
0.92
|
0.93
|
0.73
|
0.49
|
0.85
|
|
SME
|
0.93
|
0.94
|
0.75
|
0.53
|
0.87
|
|
ATT
|
0.95
|
0.96
|
0.77
|
0.60
|
0.88
|
|
SN
|
0.91
|
0.92
|
0.71
|
0.57
|
0.84
|
|
PBC
|
0.93
|
0.94
|
0.74
|
0.50
|
0.86
|
|
GPI
|
0.96
|
0.97
|
0.78
|
0.62
|
0.88
|
(HTMT<0.85; Fornell-Larcker satisfied)
The results of
reliability and validity testing were good as shown in Table-3. The Cronbach’s
Alpha (α) values for all the constructs are between 0.91 and 0.96, which are
well above the acceptance level of 0.70 and indicative of good internal
consistency of the scale items. Likewise, the values of CR for all the
constructs are found to be between 0.92 and 0.97 indicating very high
reliabilities of construct.
Convergent
validity For averaged variance extracted (AVE) were in between 0.71 and 0.78
which were acceptable since above the threshold of 0.50. It indicates that each
construct can explain a large part of variance of indicators and this suggested
good convergent validity. Additionally, discriminant validity is established by
applying Fornell-Larcker criterion, src root square of AVE (√AVE) of each
construct is above its corresponding MSV.
Thus,
for example, the constructs of ATT and GPI have √AVE = 0.88, which is higher
than their MSV values (0.60 and 0.62 resp.), showing that each construct is
empirically distinct from the others in the model. The results, in general,
prove that the measurement model is reliable, convergent valid and discriminant
valid. With these, it can be said the constructs applied in this study are both
reliable and distinctive, and thus can help to reinforce the strength of the
structural model analysis and hypothesis testing in following procedure.
4.3 Structural Model
and Hypothesis Testing
SEM Fit: χ²(579)=1262.3, χ²/df=2.18,
CFI=0.96, RMSEA=0.048, R²_GPI=0.79, Q²=0.62.
Direct Effects:
Table-4 Structural Model and Hypothesis Testing
|
Hypothesis
|
Path
|
β
|
SE
|
t
|
p
|
Result
|
|
H1a
|
ATT→GPI
|
0.40
|
0.034
|
11.76
|
<0.001
|
Supported[7]
|
|
H1b
|
SN→GPI
|
0.30
|
0.039
|
7.69
|
<0.001
|
Supported
|
|
H1c
|
PBC→GPI
|
0.22
|
0.037
|
5.95
|
<0.001
|
Supported
|
|
H2a
|
IC→GPI
|
0.23
|
0.036
|
6.39
|
<0.001
|
Supported[16]
|
|
H2b
|
eWOM→GPI
|
0.19
|
0.035
|
5.43
|
<0.001
|
Supported
|
|
H2c
|
SME→GPI
|
0.17
|
0.034
|
5.00
|
<0.01
|
Supported[24]
|
The result of the structural model shows a good fit to
the data based on the fit indices (χ²/df = 2.18, CFI = 0.96, RMSEA = 0.048),
which are all within accepted criteria. This indicates that the extended
TPB-digital model is able to capture the observed relationships well. In
addition, the model predicts a significant amount of variance in green purchase
intention (GPI's R² = 0.79), with the three constructs explaining 79% of the
variance in students' green purchase intention. The predictive relevance is
also substantial (Q² = 0.62), which indicates a strong out-of-sample predictive
power.
The direct effects show
that all postulated connections are positive and significant. Among the TPB
components, attitudes (ATT → GPI, β = 0.40, p < 0.001) is the strongest
predictor, suggesting that a positive evaluation of green products by students is
the most important determinant of their purchase intentions. It is followed by
subjective norms (SN → GPI, β = 0.30), which emphasizes the significance of
peer influence and social pressure, and perceived behavioral control (PBC →
GPI, β = 0.22) that embodies the influence of how easy/difficult it is to
perform the behavior.
Among the digital
dimension constructs, IC ( → GPI, β = 0.23) has the greatest impact on
students’ intentions, implying that trustworthy influencers have a great
influence on students’ intentions among the digital aspects. Electronic
word-of-mouth (eWOM → GPI, β = 0.19) in this context has also a significant
impact, highlighting the relevance of online reviews and communication among
peers. However, social media engagement (SME → GPI, β = 0.17), it is
significant, has the weakest effect, which means engagement itself is less
influential without reliable and persuasive information. In summary,
the findings reveal that although the TPB variables are still the strongest
predictors, the inclusion of digital factors provides a better explanatory
model.
4.4 Mediation Analysis
(H3) – Interpretation
The mediating mechanism
offers more innovative explanation for the influence of authenticity on green
purchase intention in the context of influencer marketing. The eWOM (β = 0.13,
95% CI [0.09, 0.18]) was a significant mediator of the relationship from IC
through SN to GPI, indicating the mediation (IC → SN → GPI). Notably, the
direct effect of influencer credibility on GPI reduces from β = 0.28 to β =
0.15 when entering the mediator, suggesting the full mediation.
Therefore, this supports
our assertion that the credibility of influencers does not directly lead to the
purchase intention; instead, it is mediated by eWOM that shapes subjective
norms and then affects intention. To put it another way, authoritative influences
bring about more discussion, review and peer to peer interaction online in the
process, then this generates social pressure or normative influence, leading
students to be active in buying green products. This illustrates the indirect,
and indeed socially embedded, role of digital influence.
4.5 Moderation Analysis
– Interpretation
The moderation analysis
conducted via multi-group SEM suggests that there are significant group differences,
indicating subtle demographic influences on model relations. With respect to
the difference at course level (UG vs PG), the effect of social media
engagement on GPI is significantly greater for the PG cohort (β = 0.23), as
compared to the UG cohort (β = 0.12), with a significant chi-square difference
(Δχ² = 7.2, p < 0.01). It may also indicate that PGs are more likely to
convert the interaction on social media into real green purchase intention,
which may be attributed to higher maturity, awareness or cognitive processing
ability. Thus, H4 is supported in that course is a significant moderator of the
relationship.
With regard to
gender differences, the relationship between influencer credibility and
attitude (IC → ATT) is stronger for females (β = 0.28) than males (β = 0.17),
with a significant difference (Δχ² = 5.9, p < 0.05). This indicates that
female students respond more strongly to authentic influencers when it comes to
their attitudes to the green products. It shows a higher sensitivity of trust,
relatability or emotional appeal in influencer communication in females. Hence,
H5 is supported in that gender moderate.
Overall Insight
The results collectively
suggest that the extended TPB model based on digital constructs can well
explain the green purchase intentions of students. Although attitude is still
the most powerful predictor, digital factors, in particular influencer credibility
and eWOM, have a significant indirect and enhancing effect. Moreover, the
existence of mediation and moderation effects indicates that green purchase
behaviour is influenced not only by simple relations, but shaped also by social
processes and demographic variations, which makes the model theoretically sound
and practical.
4.6 Discussion
The discussion section interprets the empirical findings
from the structural equation modeling (SEM) analysis, linking them to
theoretical frameworks, prior literature, contextual factors specific to
Chhattisgarh students, and broader implications for sustainable
consumption. It highlights how digital
influences extend the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) while addressing
regional barriers, providing a nuanced understanding of green purchase
intention (GPI) among youth in tier-2 India.
Interpretation of Core TPB Relationships
Attitude towards green products was a most significant
predictor in determining the GPI (β=0.40, p<0.001) followed by subjective
norm (β=0.30) and perceived behavioral control (PBC; β=0.22). The preeminence
corresponds to Paul et al. (2016), who
established attitude as the most influential factor in the case of Indian youth
but is higher than average of the TPB meta-analyses (β=0.27–0.35). 3.6.2
Attitude: Among Raipur students the high mean positive attitude (M=5.18) shows
their health-related notion about green cosmetics ("Green products enhance
my health") that was increased by Instagram Reels (68% of respondents).
Contrary to developed-market studies that reveal PBC to be as influential as
attitude (e.g., Han et al., 2010), its less potent effect here (M=3.72) can be
explained by affordability issues - 66% of students survive on a monthly pocket
money of ₹3,000-7,000 despite a 25% green premium - producing a stark
intention-behaviour gap typical of emerging markets.
Subjective norms (SN; M=4.58) had a strong effect
(β=0.30), higher than the world averages (meta β=0.24) and were led by the
dynamics among hostel peers (66% quoted "Hostel mates buy
green products"). This collectivist stance parallels Yadav and Pathak
(2015) among Indian youth, but it is distinctly heightened in the campus
culture of Chhattisgarh due to the fact that students reside together making a
different kind of normative pressures which are missing in individualistic or
metro contexts.
Role of Digital Influences
Result associated with β = widely known among users (IC;
β=0.23), eWOM (β=0.19), and social media engagement (SME; β=0.17)—together
accounted for a further 15% of the variance in GPI, bringing the total R² to
0.79 as opposed to traditional TPB's 0.40-0.68. The significance of IC
validates Ohanian (1990) and recent extensions (Lou & Yuan, 2019; Prayogo
& Adiwijaya, 2025), since Raipur micro-influencers were found to be the
trusted source to fill the gaps on green claims (“Raipur influencers understand
student budgets”; M=4.51). The influence of eWOM (72% via Instagram Stories)
supports Cheung and Thadani (2012), diminishing the risk perception of latent
green products. SME topped means (M=4.78; 84% daily Instagram >1hr),
corroborating Brodie et al. (2013) on engagement being emotive strengthening
but Reels were the most effective among Gen Z in terms of interactivity.
The present results contribute to extending Nekmahmud et
al. (2022) and Kohar and Bansal (2026) by considering digital factors as
direct, rather than core determinants, in TPB – a conceptualization
particularly suitable for tier-2 locations where conventional media is slow to
catch up.
Mediation: eWOM as a Process Mechanism
eWOM fully mediated IC → SN (indirect β=0.13, 95% CI
[0.09,0.18]), reducing the direct effect from 0.28 to 0.15. This new pathway
posits influencers as “ignition points” whose messages achieve normative
legitimacy through peer amplification, consistent with Ismagilova et al. (2017)
and Parveen and Chaudhary (2025). In Chhattisgarh's student milieu, Instagram
Stories enable swift vetting ("Positive student reviews"), congealing
personal trustworthiness into social coercion—accounting for SN's augmented
influence. This mediation exceeds partial effects in Zaman et al. (2024)
highlighting eWOM's 'dual engine' (informational + normative) attractiveness
within digital-native cohorts. Moderation: Demographic Heterogeneity
Postgraduates showed a higher degree of SME → GPI (β=0.23
vs. undergraduates β=0.12; Δχ²=7.2, p<0.01)which was due to the higher level
of digital maturity and exposure(e.g., analytical Reels consumption). Females
exhibited stronger IC → ATT (β=0.28 vs. males β=0.17; Δχ²=5.9, p<0.05),
parallel to Djafarova and Rushworth (2017) on gender-socialization influences,
as females place more importance on relational trust within beauty/green
sectors. These boundary conditions contour Vishrutha and Thiruchelvi (2025) by
illustrating how course level serves as a stand in for experience and gender
for persuasion susceptibility in emerging markets.
Theoretical Contributions
1. Model Extension: Digital variables enhance TPB's
explanatory power (R²) by 15%, supporting the argument for the adoption of
hybrid models (Chen & Tung, 2014; Muna et al., 2025).
2. Process Innovation: The mediation of eWOM also
mediated source credibility and norms, a novel finding in student-green TPB.
3. Contextual novelty: Vegetation esteem is the first
study from the SE of India to attempt SEM with mediation and moderation
supported, closing gaps from non-metro India (no regional prior studies).
4. Boundary refinement: Course/gender interactions detail
the Theoretical Predictive Behavior model's extent of generalizability.
Limitations and Future Directions
Although
self-report measures are susceptible to social desirability, the
cross-sectional design also constrains any suggestions of
causality—therefore longitudinal or experimental studies are warranted. Expand to rural colleges, track actual
purchases, or test interventions (eg, voucher RCTs). Qualitative hostel ethnographies could unpack
SN micro-dynamics
These
findings enable the extended TPB-digital model to be developed as a scalable
approach for promoting sustainable youth markets in other similar emerging
contexts. 5.
5.Conclusion and Implications
The present study validated
an extended Theory of Planned Behavior model with digital constructs
influencers’ credibility, electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM), and social media
engagement as good predictors of green purchase intention among half a thousand
university students in Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Results support all hypothesized
direct effects, with attitude as the strongest predictor (β=0.40) and strong
digital-augmenting influences contributing to a very high explanatory power of
R²=0.79—unparalleled in TPB literature. Importantly, full mediation of eWOM
between influencer credibility and subjective norms as well as course-level and
gender moderations unravel complex route(s) in which Instagram-driven
interactions (84% daily use) convert the self into collective sustainable
action. Contextual specificities, e.g., strong affordability barriers (PBC
M=3.72) and hostel-enhanced norms, highlight the applicability of the model to
tier-2 Indian setting, thereby contributing fundamental insights into non-metro
green consumer studies.
From a theoretical point of view, this study contributes to behavioral
models by providing evidence for the incremental validity of digital factors in
an emerging market, integrating source credibility theory with TPB in the
context of an novel eWOM mediator as well as identifying demographic boundary
conditions which are not found in previous global research. Brands should
take advantage of Raipur micro-influencers for Reels campaigns (74% reach), RMD
can easily provide 20-25% discount for students to deal with PBC barrier, use
Stories for peers validation (64% effectiveness). Universities and policy
makers may create change via green hostel vending, sustainability curricula,
and government-sponsored eco-vouchers (ex., ₹500 per semester), capitalizing on
students’ high level of engagement (SME M=4.78) to close the intention-behavior
gap. Although self-report constraints imply potential longitudinal and
experimental continuations, findings of this study serve as a blueprint that
can be scaled for digital-green marketing aimed at Gen Z in comparable
developing areas.
Acknowledgements
We are thankful to the 512 university
students at PRSU, IGKV, CSVTU, OPJIT and Hemchand Yadav University who took
time out to fill the survey, and provided insights into their green consumption
practices. We also thankful to the anonymous reviewers and peers for their
comments and suggestions to improve this extended TPB study of digital influences
within the student market of Chhattisgarh.
References
1.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned
behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2),
179–211.
2.
Brodie, R. J., Hollebeek, L. D., Juric, B.,
& Ilic, A. (2013). Customer engagement in a virtual brand community. Journal
of Business Research, 66(1), 105–114.
3.
Chen, M. F., & Tung, P. J. (2014).
Developing an extended theory of planned behavior model to predict consumers’
intention to visit green hotels. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112,
141–152.
4.
Chen, Y. S. (2010). The drivers of green
brand equity: Green brand image, green satisfaction, and green trust. Journal
of Business Ethics, 93(2), 307–319.
5.
Chen, Y. S., & Chang, C. H. (2012).
Enhance green purchase intentions: The roles of green perceived value, green
perceived risk, and green trust. Management Decision, 50(3), 502–520.
6.
Cheung, C. M., & Thadani, D. R. (2012).
The impact of electronic word-of-mouth communication: A literature analysis and
integrative model. Decision Support Systems, 54(1), 461–470.
7.
Djafarova, E., & Rushworth, C. (2017).
Exploring the credibility of online celebrities’ Instagram profiles in
influencing the purchase decisions of young female users. Computers in Human
Behavior, 68, 1–7.
8.
Erkan, I., & Evans, C. (2016). The
influence of eWOM in social media on consumers’ purchase intentions: An
extended approach to information adoption. Computers in Human Behavior, 61,
47–55.
9.
Filieri, R. (2015). What makes online reviews
helpful? A diagnosticity-adoption framework to explain informational and
normative influences in e-WOM. Journal of Business Research, 68(6),
1261–1270.
10. Freberg, K., Graham, K., McGaughey, K., & Freberg, L.
(2011). Who are the social media influencers? A study of public perceptions of
personality. Public Relations Review, 37(1), 90–92.
11. Han, H., Hsu, L. T., & Sheu, C. (2010). Application
of the theory of planned behavior to green hotel choice. Tourism Management,
31(3), 325–334.
12. Handranata, Y. W., & Kalila, N. (2025). Influence of
social media influencers on purchase intention: The mediating role of brand
attitude. Frontiers in Communication, 10, 1583602.
13. Harrigan, P., Evers, U., Miles, M., & Daly, T.
(2017). Customer engagement with tourism social media brands. Journal of
Business Research, 81, 1–10.
14. Ismagilova, E., Dwivedi, Y. K., Slade, E., &
Williams, M. D. (2017). Electronic word of mouth (eWOM) in the marketing
context: A state of the art analysis and future directions. Springer.
15. Joshi, Y., & Rahman, Z. (2015). Factors affecting
green purchase behaviour and future research directions. Journal of Cleaner
Production, 112, 141–152.
16. King, R. A., Racherla, P., & Bush, V. D. (2014). What
we know and don’t know about online word-of-mouth. Journal of Interactive
Marketing, 28(3), 167–183.
17. Kohar, A., & Bansal, S. (2026). Social media
influence on green purchase intention: The mediating role of electronic
word-of-mouth. Journal of Promotion Management.
18. Leong, C. M., Loi, A. M., & Woon, S. (2022). The
influence of social media eWOM on purchase intention. Journal of Marketing
Analytics, 10(2), 145–157.
19. Lou, C., & Yuan, S. (2019). Influencer marketing: How
message value and credibility affect consumer trust. Journal of Interactive
Advertising, 19(1), 58–73.
20. Muna, N., Mitariani, N., & Telagawathi, N. (2025).
Eco-conscious consumers and influencer marketing: Understanding green purchase
behavior through TPB. International Journal of Marketing Studies.
21. Nekmahmud, M., Fekete-Farkas, M., & Gál, M. (2022).
The role of social media in shaping green purchase intention. Technology in
Society, 68, 101821.
22. Ohanian, R. (1990). Construction and validation of a
scale to measure celebrity endorsers’ perceived expertise, trustworthiness, and
attractiveness. Journal of Advertising, 19(3), 39–52.
23. Parveen, A., & Chaudhary, R. (2025). Role of
electronic word-of-mouth in shaping green purchase intention. Vision: The
Journal of Business Perspective.
24. Paul, J., Modi, A., & Patel, J. (2016). Predicting
green product consumption using theory of planned behavior. Journal of
Retailing and Consumer Services, 29, 123–134.
25. Prayogo, R. R., & Adiwijaya, Z. A. (2025). Green
influencer marketing and purchase intention: An extended TPB approach. International
Journal of Integrated Marketing.
26. Ramdhani, M. A., et al. (2025). The effect of electronic
word-of-mouth quality and credibility on purchase intention through information
adoption. International Journal of Scientific Research and Management.
27. Sardar, A., et al. (2021). eWOM and information adoption
behavior. SAGE Open, 11(4).
28. Vishrutha, K., & Thiruchelvi, A. (2025). Impact of
green influencers on purchase intention in emerging markets. Journal of
Interactive Consumer Research.
29. Yadav, R., & Pathak, G. S. (2015). Young consumers’
intention towards buying green products. Journal of Cleaner Production, 135,
732–739.
30. Zaman, U., Basith, A., & Alam, M. (2024). The
influence of electronic word-of-mouth and perceived value on green purchase
intention. Journal of Consumer Behaviour.