Awareness and Uses of Open Educational Resources by
Research Scholars of Pt. Ravishankar Shukla University, Raipur (C.G.): A Survey
Harish Kumar Sahu1, Toran Lal Khunte2
1,2SoS in Library and
Information Science, Pt. Ravishankar Shukla University, Raipur (C.G) India.
492010
1harishkumarsahu1974@gmail.com,
2torankhunte@gmail.com
Abstract
This
study is related to the level of awareness and usage of Open Educational
Resources (OER) by researchers of Pandit Ravishankar Shukla University, Raipur.
This study investigates the benefits and barriers to the use of OER by the
research scholars of the university. This study is survey based for which 100 structured
questionnaires were distributed to the researchers doing research in the
university by visiting departments and through Google Form, out of which filled
responses were received from 67 research scholars. The study reveals that a
significant majority of research scholars (92.54%) are aware of Open
Educational Resources (OER), and 82.09% actively use them. The most widely
recognized platform is YouTube, with 95.52% awareness and 77.61% usage for
educational video lectures, followed by Shodhganga, with 83.58% awareness and
70.15% usage. However, barriers such as poor internet access (29.85%) and
concerns about the authenticity of information (23.88%) still persist, although
a small portion (11.94%) report no difficulties in accessing OERs.
Keywords:
Open
Educational Resources (OER), Educational video lectures, Information and
Communication Technology (ICT), Creative Commons license, Research scholars,
Pt. Ravishankar Shukla University,
Raipur.
Introduction
The
development of information and communication technology (ICT) has resulted in
significant changes in teaching, learning and research. Higher education
institutions around the world have been using digital web resources to enhance
and extend teaching, learning and research for decades due to the development
of information and communication technology (ICT). The use of Open Educational
Resources (OER) in research and education has recently increased due to the
development of ICT. Teaching, learning and research materials that are freely
available in the public domain for unrestricted use and modification by others,
or freely available under a Creative Commons license, are called Open
Educational Resources (OER). Since its introduction in 2002 by
UNESCO, Open Educational Resources (OER) has transformed access to education
and research by providing a cost-effective alternative to traditional academic
materials. OER is particularly helpful for researchers who rely on access to
the most recent scholarly materials to support their studies and research, and
it reflects elements of continuous quality development. Despite the benefits of
OER, it remains underutilized in many universities.(Kumar et al.) One of the main projects in India
is Access to Open Educational Resources, which provides a wealth of scholarly
content online through platforms such as Rai Open Courseware, NPTEL, CEC,
OSCAR, e-Gyankosh, NCERT, NSDL and NDLI. (Munisamy and
Sivaraman).
Importance of OER for Research Scholars
Because they offer free and unrestricted access to
educational materials that support academic study and teaching, Open Educational
Resources (OER) are essential for research scholars. OER gives researchers
access to and usage of assets including research papers, audio and video
instructional materials, and textbooks. (Springer Open). OER promotes international collaboration among
academics across boundaries and disciplines by facilitating the interchange of
ideas, research findings, and instructional strategies. It encourages sharing
and teamwork. Open Educational Resources (OER) diminishes cost efficiency for
researchers and students from diverse economic backgrounds by lowering the cost
of accessing educational content. OER encourages creativity in research by
making fresh learning resources, open data, and a range of viewpoints
accessible. OER is easily incorporated and converted into a variety of learning
forms, giving academics access to flexible and personalized learning resources. (OASIS).
Review of Literature
Kumar,
Amit et al (2021) The study investigated social scientists'
knowledge, utilization, and obstacles with reference to open educational
resources (OER) in a few Indian institutions. 300 participants
from universities including Delhi University, Jawaharlal Nehru University,
Mizoram University, and Jamia Millia Islamia were interviewed for the study
using a standardized questionnaire. The results showed that usage and awareness of: OER
was known to a sizable portion of participants (65.69%), with men being
slightly more aware of it than women (57.72%). On the other hand, obstacles
such a lack of ICT expertise, a preference for printed materials, and trouble
obtaining OER were noted. The two most important concerns were accessibility to
OER and technical expertise. The percentage of respondents who said they were
unsure of how to obtain OER was about 38.38%. Lack of infrastructure and
scepticism about the value of OER, particularly in terms of relevance and
quality, were two further issues.(Kumar et al.)
Danyaro, Abdu et al (2024) The study of “Awareness and Attitudes of Pre-Service
Teachers towards the Use of Open Educational Resources (OER) for Learning in
Kano State, Nigeria” highlights how OER have the power to revolutionize
education by simplifying and improving instruction. Using a questionnaire
created by the researcher to collect data, a total of 315 pre-service teachers were sampled using stratified
sampling technique in two selected Kano State Colleges of Education: Federal
College of Education, Kano, and Saadatu Rimi College of Education, Kano. The
findings revealed that pre-service teachers have a good awareness of OER, with
an average awareness score of 3.37 on a 4-point scale. Instructors are willing to incorporate
open educational resources (OER) in their pedagogical activities, as evidenced
by their positive attitudes towards using OER for learning. There is no
significant difference in awareness or attitudes towards open educational
resources (OER) among male and female pre-service instructors.(Danyaro et al.)
Munisamy, Raju and P. Sivaraman (2017) The study examines awareness of open educational
resources (OER) among faculty members in arts and science colleges in
Puducherry, how often they are used, why they are used, and difficulties faced
while using them. A total of 180 questionnaires were administered to faculty
members in these institutions; 143 complete responses were collected. A
standardized questionnaire was created to assess various OER-related factors.
The study results indicate that academic staff members have a high level of
awareness about various OER platforms, indicating that they are willing to
integrate these materials into their instruction. Problems such as outdated
information, poor internet speed, and lack of user-friendliness hinder effective
use, even with a high level of awareness. The study emphasizes the value of
faculty training programs in enhancing the use and efficacy of open educational
resources (OER), and suggests that better orientation and support can raise the
standard of instruction.(Munisamy and
Sivaraman)
Nagaiah, M. And Thanuskodi S. (2023) The study aims to examine the
awareness, availability and use of ICT tools and open educational resources
(OER) by students of 12 colleges located in Pudukottai district of Tamil Nadu,
India for academic purposes. The researchers collected data from a stratified
random sample of 600 students from rural areas, drawn from the colleges, using
questionnaires. 537 responses were received, which were analysed using SPSS
26th version. The survey results show that 60% regularly use the internet on
campus. The remaining 40% do not regularly use the internet on campus.
Moderately aware of open courseware (37.2%), institutional repositories
(35.4%), online tutorials (32%), and NDL website (28.7%). Most of the
respondents reported that they face challenges in accessing OER due to lack of
training (27.9%) and lack of technical knowledge (30.5%). Additionally, many
students reported that the lack of a personal computer hinders their free
access (27.4%), and they waste a lot of time while browsing due to poor network
(24.4%).(NAGAIAH M. and THANUSKODI S.)
Objective of Study
Ø To determine the
level of awareness and understanding of Open Educational Resources (OER) among
research Scholar of Pt. Ravishankar Shukla University.
Ø To identify the
purpose and frequency of use of open educational resources by university
research scholar.
Ø To assess the
level of satisfaction of research Scholars use of open educational resources.
Ø To find out the
benefits and problems associated with the use of open educational resources by
university research Scholars.
Methodology
For
this study, first a structured questionnaire and Google form were prepared and
then the questionnaires and the link of the Google form were distributed to
various departments of the university. A total of 90 questionnaires
and the link of the Google form were distributed to various departments, out of
which 67 researchers received responses by filling up the questionnaire. MS
Excel Office has been used for tabulation and analysis of data and the 9th edition of MLA style has been used for reference.
5.
Analysis and presentation of data
Table
No. 5.1 Subject and Gender wise
Distribution of Research Scholar
SN
|
Department
|
Male
|
Female
|
Total
|
%
|
1
|
Ancient
Indian history culture and archaeology
|
2
|
0
|
2
|
2.99
|
2
|
Anthropology
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
4.48
|
3
|
Chemistry
|
3
|
6
|
9
|
13.43
|
4
|
Commerce
& Management
|
1
|
3
|
4
|
5.97
|
5
|
Computer
science
|
1
|
3
|
4
|
5.97
|
6
|
Economics
|
2
|
0
|
2
|
2.99
|
7
|
Geography
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
1.49
|
8
|
History
|
0
|
3
|
3
|
4.48
|
9
|
Language
and Literature
|
3
|
2
|
5
|
7.46
|
10
|
Library
and Information Science
|
5
|
3
|
8
|
11.94
|
11
|
Life
Science
|
2
|
5
|
7
|
10.45
|
12
|
Mathematics
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
4.48
|
13
|
Pharmacy
|
1
|
5
|
6
|
8.96
|
14
|
Philosophy
and Yoga
|
2
|
0
|
2
|
2.99
|
15
|
Physical
education
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
1.49
|
16
|
Physics
& Astrophysics
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
2.99
|
17
|
Psychology
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
1.49
|
18
|
Regional
studies and research
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
4.48
|
19
|
Sociology
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
1.49
|
|
Grand Total
|
31
|
36
|
67
|
100.00
|
Figure:
1 Gender wise distribution of Research Scholars
From the analysis of Table No. 5.1, it is clear that
there are a total of 67 research scholars who have been chosen; of them, 46.27%
are male and 54.73% are female. As an outcome, there are more female research
scholars than male researchers overall.
Table
No. 5.2 Awareness of research scholars towards OER
SN
|
Awareness
|
No. of respondents
|
%
|
1
|
Yes
|
62
|
92.54
|
2
|
No
|
5
|
7.46
|
|
Total
|
67
|
100.00
|
Figure:
2 Awareness of Research Scholars to OER
Table No. 5.2 observation clearly shows that 92.54% of
research scholars, or the majority of the selected study, are aware of Open
Educational Resources. 7.46% of research scholars reported not knowing about
free and open educational resources.
Table No. 5.3 Use of Open
Educational Resources- OER
SN
|
Use of OER
|
No. of Respondents
|
%
|
1
|
Yes
|
55
|
82.09
|
2
|
No
|
12
|
17.91
|
|
Total
|
67
|
100.00
|
Figure:
3 Use of OER by of Research Scholars
An overview of Table No. 5.3 clearly
shows that 82.09% of research
scholars, or the majority of the selected studies, use OERs. Only 17.91% of research scholars do not use OERs.
Table No. 5.4 Level of awareness and use
of various platform of OER by research scholars
SN
|
Name
of OER
|
Don't
Know
|
Don't
Know%
|
Know
|
Know%
|
Use
|
Use%
|
No. of
Respondents
|
1
|
National Repository of Open Educational Resources (NROER)
|
33
|
49.25
|
34
|
50.75
|
7
|
10.45
|
67
|
2
|
SWAYAM – NPTEL
|
27
|
40.30
|
40
|
59.70
|
19
|
28.36
|
67
|
3
|
National Digital Library of India
|
18
|
26.87
|
49
|
73.13
|
21
|
31.34
|
67
|
4
|
You Tube
|
3
|
4.48
|
64
|
95.52
|
52
|
77.61
|
67
|
5
|
Teacher Tube
|
33
|
49.25
|
34
|
50.75
|
12
|
17.91
|
67
|
6
|
Khan Academy
|
14
|
20.90
|
53
|
79.10
|
23
|
34.33
|
67
|
7
|
SAKSHAT
|
32
|
47.76
|
35
|
52.24
|
13
|
19.40
|
67
|
8
|
eGyanKosh
|
15
|
22.39
|
52
|
77.61
|
29
|
43.28
|
67
|
9
|
e-PG Pathshala
|
13
|
19.40
|
54
|
80.60
|
38
|
56.72
|
67
|
10
|
MOOCs (Massive Open OnlineCourses)
|
24
|
35.82
|
43
|
64.18
|
20
|
29.85
|
67
|
11
|
Shodhganga-E-thesis Repository
|
11
|
16.42
|
56
|
83.58
|
47
|
70.15
|
67
|
12
|
DOAJ/DOAB
|
26
|
38.81
|
41
|
61.19
|
26
|
38.81
|
67
|
13
|
NCERT
|
12
|
17.91
|
55
|
82.09
|
30
|
44.78
|
67
|
14
|
Open Textbook Library
|
23
|
34.33
|
44
|
65.67
|
17
|
25.37
|
67
|
15
|
COURSERA
|
37
|
55.22
|
30
|
44.78
|
7
|
10.45
|
67
|
16
|
OER COMMONS
|
47
|
70.15
|
20
|
29.85
|
3
|
4.48
|
67
|
17
|
The Open Education Consortium
|
44
|
65.67
|
23
|
34.33
|
5
|
7.46
|
67
|
18
|
Open Education Network
|
38
|
56.72
|
30
|
44.78
|
8
|
11.94
|
67
|
19
|
MIT Open Courseware
|
48
|
71.64
|
19
|
28.36
|
5
|
7.46
|
67
|
Figure:
4 Level of awareness and use of various platform of OER
It
is clear from Table No. 5.4 and figure 4 that most of the research Scholars 95.52%
are aware of the free educational video lectures available on YouTube, out of
which 77.61% of the researchers use it. The second highest awareness level of
Shodhganga was reported by the researchers at 83.58%, out of which 70.15% of
the researchers use Shodhganga.
Table No. 5.5 Frequency of using Open Educational Resources
SN
|
Frequency
|
No. of Respondents
|
Percent
|
1
|
Daily
|
14
|
20.90
|
2
|
2-3 on
a week
|
26
|
38.81
|
3
|
Weekly
|
9
|
13.43
|
4
|
Monthly
|
1
|
1.49
|
5
|
Sometimes
|
17
|
25.37
|
|
Total
|
67
|
100.00
|
Figure:
5 Frequency of Using OER by Research Scholar
Table
number 5.5 shows the frequency of use of OER by research
scholars. It is clear from Figure 5 that maximum 38.81% research scholars use OER 2-3 times
a week, 25.37% research scholars use OER weekly and 20.90% research scholars use OERs daily.
Table No. 5.6 Pattern of
Use of Open Educational Resource
SN
|
Pattern
|
No. of Respondents
|
Percent
|
1
|
Text/Print
|
52
|
77.61
|
2
|
Visual/Photograph
|
42
|
62.69
|
3
|
Audio
|
24
|
35.82
|
4
|
Video/Audio Visual
|
54
|
80.60
|
5
|
Animation
|
21
|
31.34
|
6
|
Other
|
5
|
7.46
|
Figure:
6 Pattern of OER using by Research Scholar
It
is evident from Table No. 5.6 that among the research
scholars selected for the study, the maximum 80.60% research
scholars use video/audio-visual pattern of OER followed by 77.61%
research scholars who use text/print pattern. Some 31.34% and
7.46% research scholars respectively indicated the use of
animation and other patterns as well.
Table
No. 5.7 Benefits of using Open Educational Resources
SN
|
Benefits
|
No. of Respondents
|
Percent
|
1
|
To
prepare for my teaching/Class/Lectures
|
39
|
58.21
|
2
|
To get
new ideas and inspirations
|
46
|
68.66
|
3
|
To
supplement my existing learning materials
|
42
|
62.69
|
4
|
To
give the learners as optional self-study materials
|
37
|
55.22
|
5
|
To
write research papers/Articles/Books/Chapters
|
54
|
80.60
|
6
|
To
learn more thoroughly about a concept
|
43
|
64.18
|
7
|
To
enhance my professional Skills
|
36
|
53.73
|
8
|
To
stay up-to-date in a subject area
|
41
|
61.19
|
Figure:
7 Benefits of using OER by Research Scholar
When
the research scholars were asked about the benefits of using OERs, most of the 80.60%
research scholars said that it is beneficial in writing research
papers/articles/book chapters as shown in Table No. 5.7. Thereafter,
68.66% and 64.18% of the research
scholars respectively said that it is helpful in getting new ideas and
inspiration and knowing more deeply about a concept.
Table
No. 5.8 Level of satisfaction in using OER by Research Scholars
SN
|
Level of Satisfaction
|
No. of Respondents
|
%
|
1
|
Extremely
satisfied
|
13
|
19.40
|
2
|
Satisfied
|
49
|
73.13
|
3
|
Low
Satisfied
|
4
|
5.97
|
4
|
Dissatisfied
|
1
|
1.49
|
|
Total
|
67
|
100.00
|
Figure:
8 Level of satisfaction in using OER by Research Scholar
Table
number 5.8 shows the level of satisfaction of research
scholars in the use of open educational resources. It is clear from figure
number 8 that 73.13% are satisfied
with the use of OER, whereas 19.40% research are extremely
satisfied. Only 5.97% and 1.49% research
scholars respectively showed low and dissatisfaction in the use of OER.
Table
No. 9 Barriers and problems towards use of OER
SN
|
Barriers
and Difficulties
|
No. of
Respondents
|
Percent
|
1
|
I know
very little about using computers and the Internet
|
8
|
11.94
|
2
|
I do
not have the technical skills to locate and use OER
|
13
|
19.40
|
3
|
Lacks
proper Internet access and connectivity.
|
20
|
29.85
|
4
|
There
is a lack of OER in my native language.
|
14
|
20.90
|
5
|
OER
cover limited subjects and disciplines.
|
13
|
19.40
|
6
|
I need
training to help me read open course materials.
|
10
|
14.93
|
7
|
The
navigation of OER repository is not user-friendly.
|
9
|
13.43
|
8
|
It is
difficult to navigate OER websites.
|
11
|
16.42
|
9
|
Doubtful
about the authenticity of the information obtained
|
16
|
23.88
|
10
|
There
is no news or information related to OER on the website.
|
15
|
22.39
|
11
|
Lack
of time to search for appropriate materials.
|
12
|
17.91
|
12
|
I feel
that using OER has little impact on my learning outcomes.
|
7
|
10.45
|
13
|
No any
barriers and difficulties
|
8
|
11.94
|
Figure:
9 Barriers and problems towards use of OER
It
is clear from Table No. 5.9 that 29.85% of
the research scholars said that there is lack of proper internet access and
connectivity and 23.88% said that there is doubt on the
authenticity of the information received from OER. Whereas 11.94%
of the research scholars indicated that they know very little about the
use of computers and internet and they do not face any kind of obstacle or
difficulty.
The
results of the study are as follows:
I. It is clear from the study that 92.54% of research
scholars, or the majority of the selected study, are aware of Open Educational
Resources and only 7.46% of research scholars reported not knowing about free
and open educational resources. Further, 82.09% of research scholars, or the majority of the selected
studies, use OERs. Only 17.91% of research scholars do not use OER.
II.
The
most of the research Scholars 95.52% are aware of the free educational video
lectures available on YouTube, out of which 77.61% of the researchers use it.
The second highest awareness level of Shodhganga was reported by the
researchers at 83.58%, out of which 70.15% of the researchers use Shodhganga.
III.
The
frequency of use of OER by research scholars. It is clear from Figure 5 that maximum 38.81% research scholars use
OER 2-3 times a week, 25.37% research
scholars use OER weekly and 20.90% research scholars use
OERs daily.
IV.
The
maximum 80.60% research scholars use video/audio-visual
pattern of OER followed by 77.61% research scholars who
use text/print pattern. Some 31.34% and 7.46%
research scholars respectively indicated the use of animation and other
patterns as well.
V.
Benefits
of using OERs, most of the 80.60% research scholars said that it is beneficial
in writing research papers/articles/book. Thereafter, 68.66% and
64.18% of the research scholars respectively said that it
is helpful in getting new ideas and inspiration and knowing more deeply about a
concept.
VI.
Barriers
and problems towards use of OER study show that 29.85% of
the research scholars said that there is lack of proper internet access and
connectivity and 23.88% said that there is doubt on the
authenticity of the information received from OER. Whereas 11.94%
of the research scholars indicated they do not face any kind of obstacle
or difficulty.
Conclusion
In
this technological era, the use of open educational resources in academic
institutions is inevitable. Most of the educational content is freely available
on various websites under the platform of open educational repositories. The
findings of the present study may be useful in understanding the needs and
expectations of the academic communities. The present study has revealed that
out of the maximum users, 82.09% researchers regularly use Open Educational
Resources (OER), and a large majority (92.54%) are aware of them. Most of the
researchers are aware of OER and have a favorable attitude towards OER. If we
take a look at the expectations of users with respect to OER, it is found that
YouTube with 95.52% awareness and 77.61% usage for instructional video
lectures, largely meets the expectations of users and is perhaps the main
reason for its wide popularity and popularity. Shodhganga is in second place
with 83.58% awareness and 70.15% usage. However, issues such as limited
internet access and concerns about the reliability of OER materials presented
challenges to their widespread use. Overall, scholars expressed positive
satisfaction with OER, recognizing its value in research and learning.
Acknowledgements
We
would like to thank all the participants (research scholars) of Pt. Ravishankar
Shukla University who participated as the source of data for this study.
Publication
Board: We would like to express our heartfelt
gratitude to the dedicated and hardworking publishing team for helping us make
our publication a success. The publication has reached new heights due to your
steadfast support, careful editing and dedication to excellence. Without your
commitment and hard work, this achievement would not have been possible.
Competing
interests: No conflict of interest can be declared by
the author.
Contributions: Each
author has made a significant contribution to this article. The final
manuscript has been read and authorized by both contributors.
Availability
of data and materials: The data sets evaluated during the
analysis in the present study are not publicly available for reasons of
confidentiality but are available to the corresponding author if required or
upon reasonable request.
References
1.
Danyaro, Abdu, et
al. “Pre-Service Teachers’ Awareness and Attitude Towards the Use of Open
Educational Resources for Learning in Kano State, Nigeria.” Suluh: Jurnal
Bimbingan Dan Konseling, vol. 9, no. 2, Mar. 2024, pp. 76–80. DOI.org
(Crossref), https://doi.org/10.33084/suluh.v9i2.6989.
2. Kumar, Amit, et
al. Open Educational Resources (OER) Issues and Problems Experienced by
Social Scientists of Select Higher Educational Institutions in India.
3.
Mittal, Brahmbhatt.
"Saurashtra University Faculty, Graduate Students, and Research Scholar
Use and Are Aware of Open Educational Resources."
IAAR Journal of Education. Volume IV,
Issue 1, June 2022.pp. 81-91. www.edu.iaar.co.
4.
Baron, Rifari. Students’ Perception of Open
Educational Resources for English Reading Material. no. 2, 2024.
5.
Panda, Sitaram, et al. “Open Educational Resources
(OERs): Issues and Problems by the Faculty Members of Technical Universities of
Odisha.” Pearl : A Journal of Library and Information Science, vol. 18,
no. 3, 2024, pp. 177–83. DOI.org (Crossref),
https://doi.org/10.5958/0975-6922.2024.00021.1.
6.
Panda, Santosh, and Sujata Santosh. “Faculty Perception
of Openness and Attitude to Open Sharing at the Indian National Open
University.” The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed
Learning, vol. 18, no. 7, Nov. 2017. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i7.2942.
7.
Tosun, Nilgün, and Soner Altintas. “AN EVALUATION OF
TEACHERS’ VIEWS ON OPEN EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES.” Turkish Online Journal of
Distance Education, vol. 25, no. 2, Apr. 2024, pp. 59–75. DOI.org
(Crossref), https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.1143357.
8.
K, Sathish Kumara,
et al. OPEN EDUCATIONAL PRACTICES FOR
RESEARCH EFFECTIVENESS TO RESEARCH SCHOLAR. International Research Journal
of Modernization in Engineering Technology and Science, vol. 3, no. 4,
2021, pp.113-121.
9.
Danyaro, Abdu, et al. “Pre-Service Teachers’ Awareness
and Attitude Towards the Use of Open Educational Resources for Learning in Kano
State, Nigeria.” Suluh: Jurnal Bimbingan Dan Konseling, vol. 9, no. 2,
Mar. 2024, pp. 76–80. DOI.org (Crossref),
https://doi.org/10.33084/suluh.v9i2.6989.
10.
Harsasi, Meirani. “THE USE OF OPEN EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES
IN ONLINE LEARNING: A Study of Students’ Perception.” Turkish Online Journal
of Distance Education, vol. 0, no. 0, July 2015. DOI.org (Crossref),
https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.46469.
11.
Hassall, Christopher, and David I. Lewis. “Institutional
and Technological Barriers to the Use of Open Educational Resources (OERs) in
Physiology and Medical Education.” Advances in Physiology Education,
vol. 41, no. 1, Mar. 2017, pp. 77–81. DOI.org (Crossref),
https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00171.2016.
12.
Hilton, John. “Open Educational Resources, Student
Efficacy, and User Perceptions: A Synthesis of Research Published between 2015
and 2018.” Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 68, no.
3, June 2020, pp. 853–76. DOI.org (Crossref),
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09700-4.
13.
Kanwar, Asha, et al. “Toward Sustainable Open Education
Resources: A Perspective From the Global South.” American Journal of
Distance Education, vol. 24, no. 2, May 2010, pp. 65–80. DOI.org
(Crossref), https://doi.org/10.1080/08923641003696588.
14.
Kurelovic, Elena Krelja. “Advantages and Limitations of
Usage of Open Educational Resources in Small Countries.” International
Journal of Research in Education and Science, vol. 2, no. 1, Oct. 2015, p.
136. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.21890/ijres.92299.
15.
Munisamy, Raju, and P. Sivaraman. OPEN EDUCATIONAL
RESOURCES IN INDIA FOR TEACHING-LEARNING – A UTILIZATION PERSPECTIVE WITH
REFERENCE TO THE FACULTIES OF ARTS AND SCIENCE COLLEGES IN PUDUCHERRY.
16.
Ojo, Olugbenga D., et al. “Effect of Open Educational
Resources on Teaching and Learning as Perceived by Lecturers in Selected
Nigerian Universities.” The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology,
vol. 22, no. 1, 2023.
17.
Seema Teotia Raju. “A Study
18.
Importance of Open Educational Resources (OER) for
Teaching and Learning Process.” IDEALISTIC JOURNAL OF ADVANCED RESEARCH IN
PROGRESSIVE SPECTRUMS (IJARPS), vol. 02, no. 01, 2023.