A Study on Cyber-Crime Awareness
Among Students in Chhattisgarh
Mamta Sahu1,*, Prabhavati Shukla2
1,2 School of Studies in Psychology, Pt.
Ravishankar Shukla University, Raipur, C.G.
Abstract:
The
current study's objective is to ascertain students' awareness of cybercrime in
the Chhattisgarh region. In the world we live in, technology is now required in
every aspect of life from house hold work to running a multinational company
and national security. Although technology makes life easier, there are risks
associated with it, such as cybercrime (fraud, assault, bullying, sexual
harassment, phishing). Students must understand that cyber security awareness
is necessary to prevent any kind of cyber-crime. For understanding the
cyber-awareness among Students of Chhattisgarh we collected data from Pt.
Ravishankar Shukla University in Raipur. The cyber-crime awareness scale
created by Dr. S. Rajasekar (2011) was used to test students' awareness of
cybercrime using a questionnaire-based survey method. In this study, student
demographic information (gender, location) is taken into account when measuring
understanding of cyber-threats. . The hypothesis is tested using the t-test.
The results show that although male and female students' knowledge of
cybercrime is not statistically different, there is a significant difference
between students in rural and urban locations.
Keywords: Cyber-crime, awareness, Technology.
1. Introduction
India is becoming a more technologically advanced
Nation, with the second-largest internet population in the world. As the
digital world expands, our society becomes more vulnerable. As technology
advances, cybercrime poses a serious threat to both our nation and the rest of
the world. Cybercrime encompasses offenses involving computers and the internet;
these are recognized as white-collar crimes, such as cyber fraud, phishing,
hacking, identity theft, data theft, blackmail, harassment, and bullying. In a cybercrime,
the computer or the data itself is either the tool used to carry out the
offense and provide the necessary inputs for that offense or it is the target
or the object of the offense. Cybercrime is the umbrella term for all of these
illegal activities. Cybercrimes are committed using technology, and their
perpetrators have extensive technological knowledge. In reality, cybercriminals
are IT intellectuals who are well-versed in the subtleties of information
technology. National boundaries and other obstacles are not recognized or
acknowledged by cybercrime.
Generally speaking, cybercrimes fall into one of three
categories:
1. Target cybercrime: this type of crime involves the
international destruction of a computer.
2. Tool cybercrime: this type of crime involves using a
computer to perform an offense.
3. Computer incidental: this type of crime is one in
which the use of a computer is only incidentally related to the conduct of the
offense.
As technology advances, so do the number of people
using the internet and social media. In addition, during and after the COVID-19
pandemic, an increasing number of services—whether related to businesses,
education, healthcare, government, or consumer services—have shifted to online
platforms. People of all ages use the Internet, computers, and social media in
this way, but younger people use them more frequently. While technological
advancement is a positive thing, it has also led to the emergence of numerous
threats, including cybercrime. The fact that young people are less aware of the
issue may also be contributing to the rise in cybercrime cases.
The number of cybercrimes reported in India increased
significantly in 2021 compared to the previous year. More than 52,000 instances
of cybercrime were reported in that year. During the time period under
observation, Karnataka and Uttar Pradesh accounted for the largest share
(Tanushree Basuroy, October 13, 2022). The majority of these cases were filed
under the IT Act with the intention of defrauding people or abusing their
sexuality.
In 2020, over 18.4 thousand people were arrested on
account of cyber-crimes across India. Furthermore, over 18 thousand people were
charged with legal proceeding for such crimes. Overall, the highest number of
arrest and legal charges were computer related offences, followed by
cyber-crimes related to publication and transmission of obscene and sexually
explicit data (Tanushree Basuroy, October 13, 2022).
In 2021, the state of Maharashtra in India had the
highest number of cyber stalking and bullying incidents against women and
children to the rest of the country, with nearly 62 cases registered with the
authorities. Telangana followed with 13 cases. Overall, the country recorded
approximately 123 cases of such offences that same year. This category of crime
came under the purview of section 354D of the Indian Penal Code ((Tanushree
Basuroy, October 14, 2022).
A cyber-security software company called Norton
Lifelock reported that 27 million Indian adults have experienced identity theft
in the past year, and 52% of the population does not know how to protect them
from cybercrime.
Additionally, the National Cyber Crime Reporting
Portal was introduced by the Ministry of Home Affairs on August 30, 2019, to
provide a centralized system for reporting online incidents of cybercrime, with
a particular emphasis on cybercrime against women and children. The portal's
statistics show that, from the country's founding to February 28, 2021, total 3,17,439
cybercrime events and 5,771 FIRs have been recorded, with 21,562 cybercrime
occurrences and 87 FIRs in Karnataka and 50,806 cybercrime incidents (National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal, 2019).
Types of Cyber-Crime:
· Identity theft:
In this case, someone steals your identity in order to deceive someone for
money, property, or something else.
· Phishing:
Phishing is a type of cybercrime where a person pretending to be a reputable organization
contacts a target or targets via email, phone, or text message in an attempt to
trick them into divulging sensitive information, including passwords, banking
and credit card information, and personally identifiable information.
· Social engineering: The psychological manipulation of individuals into carrying out tasks
or disclosing private information.
· Cyber-stalking:
attackers utilize the internet and other technology to harass or stalk another
person by taunting, defamation, false charges and extreme threats.
· Botnets:
Botnets are collections of compromised computers that are utilised to launch
different types of frauds and online attacks.
· Prohibited content: Content that amounts to war propaganda, inciting impending violence,
or advocating hatred is classified as prohibited content.
2. Review of Literature
Goel Urmila (2015), Measured the cybercrime awareness of 120 B. Ed. Students from the
Sonipat District, Haryana. Results of the study showed that there is no discernible
variation based on gender but location does have an impact on cybercrime
awareness.
Spring (2018),
conducted a survey to determine awareness of cybercrime using a self-structured
questionnaire that includes demographic data and a scale validated by S. Raj
Sekhar (2011). The hypotheses are tested using correlational analysis and
percentile analysis. Furthermore, information regarding preventing cybercrime
is provided. The results show that: 1) male students possess a greater
awareness and positive insight than female students; and 2) students between
the ages of 18 and 23 exhibit lower perception and awareness compared to those
24 years of age and older. The research also offers strategies for shielding B.
Ed. students from cybercrime, which lowers their high vulnerability to
victimization
Thakur (2018), investigated
the topic of "Gender and Locale Differences in Adolescent Cyber-Crime
Awareness." The study used the Rajasekhar Cyber-Crime Awareness Scale on
200 teenagers between the ages of 16 and 18. They discovered a strong
correlation between gender and location in their study.
Choudhary (2020), examined
the awareness of cybercrime among Haryana's higher education students in
relation to a number of demographic variables. 500 students from both
traditional and professional courses participated in this study. According to
her findings, professional students are more aware about cyber-crime than
traditional course participants, but no gender difference is found in this
study.
Suvera & Tailor (2020), conducted a comparative study of male and female B.
Ed. trainees on Cyber-Crime Awareness. Their paper is based on research done to
examine how caste, geography, and sex affect male and female B. Ed. trainees in
Gujarat's Navsari district's awareness of cybercrime. There were 360 male and
female B. Ed. trainees in the sample. Using a random method, the sample was
chosen in equal parts based on gender (male and female), area (rural and
urban), and caste (OPEN, SEBC, and ST-SC).Cyber-Crime Awareness Scale developed
by Rajshekhar (2011) was used to measure cyber-crime awareness. The data was
analyzed using the "t-test." Male and female B. Ed. trainees
awareness of cybercrime differs significantly. the data was analyzed using the
"t-test." Male and female B. Ed. trainees' awareness of cybercrime
differs significantly. The awareness of cybercrime among trainees in rural and
urban areas differs significantly. Trainees in OPEN, SEBC, and ST-SC Cyber-Crime
Awareness differ significantly from one another.
Statement of the Problem:
A
study on Cyber-Crime Awareness among students in Chhattisgarh.
Objective:
¡ To develop basic understanding of cyber-crime and its
possible dangers.
¡ To see Cyber-Crime Awareness among college students of
Chhattisgarh Region.
¡ To see Cyber-Crime Awareness of college students on
the basis of gender.
¡ To see Cyber-Crime Awareness of college students on
the basis of locality.
Hypothesis:
1) There would be no significant difference between male
and female students on Cyber-Crime Awareness.
2) There would be no significant difference between rural
and urban students on Cyber-Crime Awareness.
Variables:
|
No.
|
Name of variable
|
Nature of variable
|
Number of levels
|
Name of level
|
|
1
|
Gender
|
Discrete
|
2
|
Male/female
|
|
2
|
Locality
|
Discrete
|
2
|
Urban/ rural
|
3. Research Design:
ex-post facto research design has been used for
present study.
Sampling: for data
collection random sampling method was chosen. As per the objective of present
study students from Pt. Ravishankar University was selected randomly. 60
students were chosen for study in which 30 were from urban area remaining 30
belongs to rural areas of Chhattisgarh, 30 were males and 30 were females.
Tool description: Cyber Crime Awareness Scale (CCAS-RS) was constructed
by Dr. S. Rajasekar (2011) this scale consisted of 42 statements out of which
24 of them were positive statements and the remaining 18 were negative
statements. Each statement was set against five point scale of “strongly
agree”, “agree”, “undecided”, “disagree”, and “strongly disagree”. After
standardization of test only 36 items were remained on the scale where 21 is
positive items and 15 is negative item. The score ranges from 36 to 180. The
maximum score that one can get in this is 180. Higher score indicates the high
awareness on cyber-crime.
Validity:
the cyber-crime awareness scale has construct validity as item were selected
having the
‘t-value’ is equal to or greater than 1.75. Its
intrinsic validity was found to be 0.87 and hence this scale is valid.
Reliability: the reliability of the cyber-crime awareness scale was established by
the split-half method using Pearson product moment correlation this only gives
the reliability of the half scale and hence the co-efficient of the reliability
of the full scale was determined by using the spearman-brown prophecy formula
was found to be 0.76 which is high and therefore the scale is reliable.
Norms:
z-score and T-score norms have been developed for the cyber-crime awareness
scale.
4. Results:
Findings
have given in table no. 1, 2 and 3.table
Objective
2: to see Cyber-Crime Awareness among college students of Chhattisgarh region.
Table no. – 1
|
Score
|
No. of students
|
Interpretation
|
|
143 & above
|
19
|
Excellent awareness
|
|
133-142
|
12
|
High awareness
|
|
123-132
|
10
|
Above average awareness
|
|
108-122
|
9
|
Moderate/ average awareness
|
|
99-107
|
8
|
Below average awareness
|
|
80-98
|
2
|
Low awareness
|
Findings have given in table no. 2 and 3.table no. 2
shows that the mean of boys on cyber-crime awareness is 145 and for girls it is
138. The data shows mean difference between males and females but there is no
significant difference (t=1.96).
Table no. 3 shows that the mean of urban students on
cyber-crime awareness is 150.73 and for rural students it is 133.63. t-value is
5.05 that means there is significant difference between urban and rural
students.
Objective:2
To see Cyber-Crime Awareness of college students on the basis of gender.
Hypothesis 2 There
would be no significance difference between male and female students on
Cyber-Crime Awareness.
Table
no. 2 indicates N, mean, SD and t-value of male and female students towards
cyber-crime awareness.
|
Variables
|
Cyber-crime awareness
|
t-value
|
Significant
Level
|
|
N
|
Mean
|
SD
|
1.97
|
NS
|
|
Gender
|
Male
|
30
|
145
|
4.05
|
|
Female
|
30
|
138
|
7.13
|
Objective: 3 to see Cyber-Crime awareness of college students on
the basis of locality.
Hypothesis 2 there would be no significant difference between urban
and rural students on cyber-crime awareness.
Table
no. 3 indicates N, mean, SD, and t-value of urban and rural students.
Table
no: 3- Cyber-Crime Awareness on the
Basis Of Locality
|
Variables
|
Cyber-crime awareness
|
t-value
|
Significant
Level
|
|
N
|
Mean
|
SD
|
5.04*
|
Significant
Difference at 0.01 level
|
|
Locality
|
Urban
|
30
|
150.73
|
3.47
|
|
Rural
|
30
|
133.63
|
5.89
|
*P<0.01 level(significant
difference)
Table no. 3 shows that the mean of urban
students on cyber-crime awareness is 150.73 and for rural students it is
133.63. t-value is 5.05 that means there is significant difference between
urban and rural students.
5. Discussion:
This study is based on level of cyber-crime awareness
among students our first hypothesis that there is no significant difference
between male and female students on awareness is proven right but it shows that
there is mean difference between male and female, males are more aware about
cyber-crime and know how to prevent these threats from happening they use cyber
hygiene methods to protect themselves from any possible dangerous. But this
mean difference is not significant to prove that males are more aware this may
be because males and females both have equal access of internet and equal
knowledge opportunities has been given to them.
Our second hypothesis that there will be no
significant effect of locality on cyber-crime awareness among students has been
proven wrong data shows that there is significant difference between urban and
rural students. Urban students are more aware about internet use than rural
student this can be due to unequal opportunities or lack of proper knowledge to
rural students than urban students.
These studies show similarity from previous studies.
Cyber-crime can be most dangerous threats for the wellbeing of students so it
is necessary to teach students about cyber security and how can they prevent
any attack from internet and secure themselves from these cybercrimes.
6. Conclusion:
In
conclusion, we can assert that college students from the state of Chhattisgarh
have above-average awareness of cybercrime. Out of all the students who were
selected, 69% showed ordinary or above-average awareness of cybercrime. The
findings indicate that being educated and technologically updated has an impact
on students' awareness of cybercrime; urban students are more aware than rural
pupils. However, the findings indicated that gender had no discernible impact
on awareness of cybercrime.
Suggestions:
¡ Study on large sample is suggested for more accurate
and generalizable results.
¡ Comparative study on the basis of study area could be
done.
Reference:
Basuroy T. (2022).Number of cyber-crimes reported in
India 2012- 2021.Statista retrived fromhttps://www.statista.com/statistics/309435/india-cyber-crime- it-act/
Choudhary, D. M. (2020). Cyber Crime Awareness Among
Higher Education Students From Haryana With Respect to Various Demographical
Variables. PalArch’s Journal of Archaeology of Egypt / Egyptology, 17(7),
Article 7.
Goel(2015).Gender and locale differences in cyber
crime awareness among adolescents—ProQuest. (n.d.). Retrieved November 24,
2023, from
https://www.proquest.com/openview/a68a1a11f0cb4d04c1fca1ccdbc61461/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=2032134
National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal. (2019). Retrieved November 24, 2023, from
https://pib.gov.in/pib.gov.in/Pressreleaseshare.aspx?PRID=1703509
Suvera, D. P., & Tailor, P. R. (2020). Cyber-crime
awareness: A comparative study of male and female B.Ed. Trainees.